Physics Question!!!

A block of mass mm is attached to a spring and kept in horizontal position in a vertical plane. When the block is allowed to then, find the maximum extension in the spring.

Details--

1) Spring's constant=kk

2) Natural length of spring= ll

img img

I was trying to make a problem using some concepts of Work Energy and Circular motion and I came up with this. Here is my approach, please tell me if I am right or not.

First of all, the extension in the spring will be maximum when radial velocity (vrv_{r}) will be zero. Now the work is only done by conservative forces in this situation so we can conserve energy.

mg(l+x)cosθ=mV022+kx22mg(l+x)cos \theta=\frac{mV_{0}^{2}}{2}+\frac{kx^{2}}{2}

Now V02=Vt2+Vr2V_{0}^{2}=V_{t}^{2}+V_{r}^{2}

The extension will be maximum when Vr=0V_{r}=0. So this does not implies that the velocity of the block is zero at the lower most position. Also we can see that only a component of mgmg is acting in the tangential direction which is responsible for tangential velocity and tangential acceleration. So VtV_{t} is not going to be zero at the lower most position.

If we consider torque about point OO then

mgsinθ(l+x)=dLdtmgsin\theta (l+x)=\frac { dL }{ dt }

mgsinθ(l+x)=dIdtω+Idωdtmgsin\theta (l+x)=\frac { dI }{ dt } \omega +I\frac { d\omega }{ dt }

I=m(l+x)2I=m{ (l+x) }^{ 2 }

dIdt=m(2xvr+2lvr)\frac { dI }{ dt } =m(2x{ v }_{ r }+2l{ v }_{ r })

mgsinθ(l+x)=2m(x+l)vrω+Idωdtmgsin\theta (l+x)=2m(x+l){ v }_{ r }\omega +I\frac { d\omega }{ dt }

I got this equation. There is a term of vrv_{r} in the equation that has to related with ω \omega or θ \theta to solve the problem.

Although the motion is not circular but if consider the motion of the block for a very small interval of time then we can assume that it's a circular motion so vt=(l+x)ωv_{t}=(l+x) \omega. Can we do so?

Using this we can express VrV_{r} in term of angular velocity. But still there is term containing xx there. How can this be solved?

Am I overlooking some thing very obvious? Because using calculus in spring problem often gets very complicated.

#Mechanics

Note by Satvik Pandey
6 years, 1 month ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Log in to reply

@satvik pandey i suppose whatever you have said till now is correct..!!
It is a case of Coriolis force.. When the particle has radial speed as well then the acceleration is written as

Therefore we cannot write the equation of centripetal force as discussed before..!!

Rohit Gupta - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Yes Carioles component comes in to when the sliding part is curved. Can this problem be transformed in a such a mechanism ?

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years ago

Thank you ! Sir. Sorry for delay in replying. You got equation using polar co-ordinates. right?

Sir, could you please help me here.

satvik pandey - 6 years ago

Could you post whole analysis(solution) of the problem (along with calculation).

satvik pandey - 6 years ago

We can use gsinθ=dat/dtg sin \theta =da_{t}/dt and substitute at=(l+x)αa_{t}=(l+x) \alpha by approximation but still we get the same situation.

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

I think that should be dvrdt=gcosθkx/m\frac{dv_r}{dt} = gcos\theta-kx/m

And dvtdt=gsinθ\frac{dv_t}{dt} = gsin \theta

You should go with energy conservation , thats easier

Kushal Patankar - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

I wrote datdt \frac { { da }_{ t } }{ dt } by mistake.

I tried to use energy conservation. But here entire gravitational energy in not getting converted to spring potential energy only. A part of it is also converted to kinetic energy. I think the extension will be maximum when the radial velocity would be zero.right? But this does not implies that tangential velocity would also be zero at that moment.

Let xx be tha maximum extension in the spring then-

mg(l+x)=mvt2+kx22mg(l+x)=\frac{mv_{t}^{2}+kx^{2}}{2}. There are two variables vtandxv_{t} and x. And we have only one equation.

What do you think? @Kushal Patankar

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Satvik Pandey Cetripetal accleration equation will give the relation between vtv_t and x %6 %6

I made Vr zero.

Kushal Patankar - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Kushal Patankar How could I miss that!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you Kushal for helping.

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

@Kushal Patankar I have one more confusion.

The motion of the block is not a pure circular motion which increases the intricacy of the problem.

I think we can not just equate kxkx and mgcosθmgcos \theta to centripetal force. There is acceleration other that centripetal acceleration in radial direction because the block is performing radial motion also.

I think the equation should be

mgcosθkx=m{dVrdtVt2(l+x)}mgcos\theta -kx=m\left\{ \frac { d\vec { { V }_{ r } } }{ dt } -\frac { { V }_{ t }^{ 2 } }{ (l+x) } \right\}

Taking radially outward as +ve direction.

What do you think, Kushal??

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Satvik Pandey What is the need for that equation , I mean that mechanical energy conservation does all our work. And I think that the equation u made is correct for intermediate radial acceleration.

Kushal Patankar - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Kushal Patankar How you got the second equation??

The radial velocity is zero at the lower most position but this doesn't implies that radial acceleration dVrdt\frac { \vec { { dV }_{ r } } }{ dt } is also zero at that point. Am I missing some thing very obvious? :(

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

There are two VrV_rs ? Why should radial velocity be zero in all positions ?

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

VrV_{r} and vrv_{r} both represents radial velocity. In order to achieve maximum extension in the spring the radial velocity of the block should be zero at a particular point. It is not zero through out the motion.

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

In the sketch both VrV_r look the same.

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

My handwriting is not very good. Velocity of the block along the spring is vrv_{r} and velocity of the block tangential to the spring is vtv_{t}.

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

Thank you.

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

You are welcome!!! :)

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

Satvik Please answer my to my comment in this

Rajdeep Dhingra - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

The total velocity is sum of the squares of radial and tangential velocities, just like x and y components in Cartesian co-ordinates.

Then use Vt=RωV_{t}=R \omega. :)

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

What is VϕV_{\phi} ? What is it responsible for ?

Rajdeep Dhingra - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Rajdeep Dhingra It is radial velocity. It is responsible for the radial movement of the particle.

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

I think you cannot assume that the motion is circular, however small the interval you take. I for one think that maximum extension will occur at bottom-most position.

Raghav Vaidyanathan - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Even if the motion is not completely circular then I think we can use V=RωV=R \omega. Like we did here. Can we ??

I too thought that the extension will be maximum at the bottom most position. But when I thought about that after watching Kushal comment, deeply then I don't see a way to justify that. :(

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

@satvik pandey Check out the 2-D spring simulation on this page.

Raghav Vaidyanathan - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for the link! This proves that the extension is maximum at the bottom most position. :D

But what about the calculation and explanation??

satvik pandey - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Satvik Pandey Is that simulation removed.

Kushal Patankar - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Kushal Patankar You have to scroll down page to see it.

Raghav Vaidyanathan - 6 years, 1 month ago

Try to use lagrangian mechanics. Find the total kinetic energy and take the total potential energy and apply the E-L equations. There are too many forces to equate. A spring pendulum is a hard mechanical system to crack.

Krishna Karthik - 2 years, 7 months ago

There is a good video on youtube comparing Newtonian and Lagrangian mechanics on the example of the elastic pendulum, which the example here is.

Krishna Karthik - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

can u link it pls

Rohan Joshi - 4 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

@Krishna Karthik Can you resend the link? Not working

Rohan Joshi - 4 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Rohan Joshi Ah, I see what you mean. Elastic pendulum

Krishna Karthik - 4 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Krishna Karthik Thx!

Rohan Joshi - 4 months, 2 weeks ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...