This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Well, the outcome of the experiment can depend on several things. First thing I immediately noticed is that even when the ground has friction, the answer is indeterminable. it depends on how much friction there is and what angle the plank is to the floor. So what I think the answer to this question is indeterminable.
I guess it all depends upon the mass of plank and the coefficient of friction of the rough wall. Considering there is no friction on the floor, the force of friction on the wall must be greater than the weight of the plank due to gravity. If it happens, the plank will not fall,else,IT WILL.
If you consider the torque around point A (where the plank touch the wall), you'll see there is only the torque of P (plank weight) -> it will fall due to the unbalance
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Well, the outcome of the experiment can depend on several things. First thing I immediately noticed is that even when the ground has friction, the answer is indeterminable. it depends on how much friction there is and what angle the plank is to the floor. So what I think the answer to this question is indeterminable.
Apply the concept of torque.
I guess it all depends upon the mass of plank and the coefficient of friction of the rough wall. Considering there is no friction on the floor, the force of friction on the wall must be greater than the weight of the plank due to gravity. If it happens, the plank will not fall,else,IT WILL.
A similar problem is in HC Verma
If you consider the torque around point A (where the plank touch the wall), you'll see there is only the torque of P (plank weight) -> it will fall due to the unbalance