This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
You can't do it because multiplication by 0 destroys information. That is, for z=x×y, y=0, we can recover x via yz. However, when y=0, 0=x×y for all x, so there's no way to recover x through a division by y--the information about x has been destroyed. Anthropomorphically speaking, the division operator "doesn't know" what x was--x could have been any number.
This isn't true of things like i, since there's a reversal operation to recover what i "used to be"--namely, squaring it.
It's possible you could put together a system of math where division by zero is defined in cases where you know the value of x, since then you know how to reverse x×0. That is, z=x×0, and 0z=x. I leave that as an exercise for the reader. :)
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
You can't do it because multiplication by 0 destroys information. That is, for z=x×y, y=0, we can recover x via yz. However, when y=0, 0=x×y for all x, so there's no way to recover x through a division by y--the information about x has been destroyed. Anthropomorphically speaking, the division operator "doesn't know" what x was--x could have been any number.
This isn't true of things like i, since there's a reversal operation to recover what i "used to be"--namely, squaring it.
It's possible you could put together a system of math where division by zero is defined in cases where you know the value of x, since then you know how to reverse x×0. That is, z=x×0, and 0z=x. I leave that as an exercise for the reader. :)
Log in to reply
That is a clear and charitable answer, Christopher. Thanks for doing this.
Thanks;
Umm ... 0z is undefined (not a constant) for z∈C.