Suppose \( p(x) = a_{0} + a_{1} x + a_{2} x^2 +\cdots+ a_{n} x^n\).
If ∣p(x)∣≤∣ex−1−1∣ |p(x)| \leq |e^{x-1} -1|∣p(x)∣≤∣ex−1−1∣ for all non-negative real xxx, prove that ∣a1+2a2+⋯+nan∣≤1. |a_{1} +2a_{2} + \cdots+ n a_{n}| \leq 1 . ∣a1+2a2+⋯+nan∣≤1.
Note by Harsh Shrivastava 4 years ago
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
_italics_
**bold**
__bold__
- bulleted- list
1. numbered2. list
paragraph 1paragraph 2
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
This is a quote
# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"
\(
\)
\[
\]
2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
@Brian Charlesworth @Brandon Monsen
@Spandan Senapati @Aniswar S K @A E
Log in to reply
Set x=1x=1x=1 you get p(1)=0p(1)=0p(1)=0.Now in the inequality divide both the sides by ∣x−1∣|x-1|∣x−1∣.and take limit(xxx tends to 111).That won't change the inequality.The RHS takes a value 1(Lt(eu−1)/u1(Lt (e^u -1)/u1(Lt(eu−1)/u ,uuu tending to zero.And in LHS both the numerators and denominators taking the value 000(coz P(1)=0P(1)=0P(1)=0).Apply L-Hospitals rule you get ∣na(n)+(n−1)a(n−1).........+a(1)∣=<1|na(n)+(n-1)a(n-1).........+a(1)|=<1∣na(n)+(n−1)a(n−1).........+a(1)∣=<1
Thanks!!
Subjective questions in maths are a headache for me, though this is a good question I solved it the same way as spandan did.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
@Brian Charlesworth @Brandon Monsen
@Spandan Senapati @Aniswar S K @A E
Log in to reply
Set x=1 you get p(1)=0.Now in the inequality divide both the sides by ∣x−1∣.and take limit(x tends to 1).That won't change the inequality.The RHS takes a value 1(Lt(eu−1)/u ,u tending to zero.And in LHS both the numerators and denominators taking the value 0(coz P(1)=0).Apply L-Hospitals rule you get ∣na(n)+(n−1)a(n−1).........+a(1)∣=<1
Log in to reply
Thanks!!
Subjective questions in maths are a headache for me, though this is a good question I solved it the same way as spandan did.