This inequality problem is from Phan Boi Chau High School for the Gifted Grade 10 Selection Test, Nghe An, Vietnam (Yes I'm very bad at inequalities):
Let a,b,c be positive reals. Find the minimum value of P=(a+b)2a2+(b+c)2b2+4ac.
I've done 4ac=4acc2≥(c+a)2c2.
I think the minimum value is 43, so the problem is to prove cyc∑(a+b)2a2≥43. But I still can't.
Can you help?
#Algebra
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
After setting, x=ab,y=bc,z=ca this becomes:
For x,y,z∈R+ such that xyz=1, (1+x1)2+(1+y1)2+(1+z1)2≥43
I believe Lagrange Multipliers is the best way here. I'm trying to find a non-calculus approach, and I've posted the question on AoPS as well.
Log in to reply
This Inequality was used in this problem,Viet Nam TST 2006 inequality problem: PROBLEM
Continue the solution of @Ameya Daigavane . Using Cauchy-Schwarz (1+x1)2+(1+y1)2+(1+z1)2≥31(x+11+y+11+z+11)2 So now we need to have f(x,y,z)=x+11+y+11+z+11≥23. Without losing generality, we assume that x≥y≥z, then f(x,y,z)≥f(x,y,y).
Now we consider f(x,y,y). Since x≥y and xy2=1 we can have y≤1 and x=y21. f(x,y,y)=x+11+y+12=y2+1y2+y+12=(y2+1)(y+1)y3+3y2+2 Now we prove f(x,y,y)≥23 (y2+1)(y+1)y3+3y2+2≥23 ⇔2(y+1)(y2+1)2y3+6y2+4−3(y2+1)(y+1)≥0 ⇔2(y+1)(y2+1)(1−y)3≥0 (True since y≤1) So f(x,y,y)≥23⇒f(x,y,z)≥23, therefore P≥43. The equality holds when x=y=z=1 or a=b=c. @Tran Quoc Dat , you can check out this solution, I don't know whether it's ok for grade 9 mathematically specialized students to apply this method
Log in to reply
Is this "mixing of variables"? I think there's some calculus theory behind this method.
Any non calculus approach?
Log in to reply
I've tried but looks like there's no non calculus solution to this
Did you mean the f(x,y,z)≥f(x,y,y)?
Log in to reply
f(x,y,z)≥f(x,yz,yz) I think.
Oh no, he changed it, it wasLog in to reply
f(x,y,z)≤f(x,yz,yz)
I've to change because later on, I found out that actually,univariate solution always cool
It's nearly to Olympic more than selection test for grade 10.Huhmmmm
Will Nesbitt's ineq work here?