This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Polar coordinates is a way for you to change your perspective of the cartesian plane, to make it easier to understand sometimes complicated functions. There are functions whose cartesian equations are mysterious / hard to work with, but by converting into another frame of reference, gives us a lot more flexibility.
One of the big uses of polar coordinates is in transforming integration questions to make the variables easier to work with. For example, try evaluating
∫−∞∞∫−∞∞ex2+y2dxdy.
As stated in the other discussion started by Shourya:
I don't see why that is an issue. The implicit hint is that you can approach the volume of revolution question via polar coordinates, which would help simplify otherwise strange conditions. Of course, you could do the volume of revolution through normal means, and wade through the ugly integration. Likewise, you could do it via first principles,but that might not be the best approach to use.
Math isn't about sticking to just using certain techniques in certain situations, or memorizing that when you see a question of type X to use standard solution methods Y. You need the flexibility and creativity to apply what you have learnt into novel situations. Especially in the hard set, I try and present various scenarios where it may not be immediately obvious how to approach it, but the hint of the technique should get you started.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Polar coordinates is a way for you to change your perspective of the cartesian plane, to make it easier to understand sometimes complicated functions. There are functions whose cartesian equations are mysterious / hard to work with, but by converting into another frame of reference, gives us a lot more flexibility.
One of the big uses of polar coordinates is in transforming integration questions to make the variables easier to work with. For example, try evaluating
∫−∞∞∫−∞∞ex2+y2dxdy.
As stated in the other discussion started by Shourya:
I had already started a discussion before.