Let p(x)= + + be such that p(x) takes real values for real values of and non-real values for non-real values of . Prove that =0.
I tried it out taking , and to be complex values and then implemented the conditions given in the problem which only got me to a weird expression. Any correct approach ?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Hint: first prove that a, b, c are real. For this it suffices to use the fact that p(-1), p(0), p(1) are real. Specifically, express a, b & c in terms of these three values.
Next, suppose a>0. Find a sufficiently small M<0 such that p(x) = M has no real roots, or equivalently, the discriminant for ax2+bx+(c−M)=0 is negative. Do something similar for a<0.
Log in to reply
Could not follow your second argument. Please explain a bit further.
What CL did is right. 1st prove that a,b,c are real. now assume a is not equal to zero. Divide the whole polynomial by a. Give the new constants a new name. We get f(x)=x^2+bx+c. As per on your condition if x is non real then f(x) should be non-real. Since c is real we can say that x^2+bx should be non real for non real x. But there exist some non-real x which makes x^2+bx real. hence not satisfying your condition. therefore we can say that there exist no nonzero a which satisfies your condition. Now consider a =0. We have p(x)=bx+c which is nonreal for every non real x. Hence Proved