Let be a polynomial such that factorizes into linear factors.Also roots of the polynomial are all positive,where are all real numbers.Sum of all possible values of can be written as ,where and are co-prime positive integers.Find I submitted it to brilliant but they rejected,no problem.So you must try it.I want to know multiple methods of this problem.Thank You.After 2 solutions are submitted I will also share my awesome method....!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Perhaps they rejected it because you use a,b for the coefficients of g(x) as well as the value of f.
By Vieta's Relations, the sum of the 8 roots is 4 and the sum of the squares is 42−2⋅7=2.
Hence, the arithmetic mean of the roots is 84=21 and the root-mean-square of the roots is 82=21.
Therefore, we have the equality case of the RMS-AM inequality. So, all the roots are equal to 21.
Thus, g(x)=(x−21)8 is the unique polynomial g(x). So, f=g(0)=281=2561⇝a+b=257.
Log in to reply
I did the same but I used Cauchy Schwarz Inequality instead of RMS-AM inequality.But nice solution.
I would like to know why you consider that inequality? I mean you get AM=RMS but where does it really help?
Thanks!
Log in to reply
The RMS-AM Inequality states that if x1,…,xn≥0, then n1k=1∑nxk2≥n1k=1∑nxk.
Furthermore, n1k=1∑nxk2=n1k=1∑nxk=a if and only if x1=⋯=xn=a.
In this problem, that theorem allows us to conclude that the roots of g(x) are all equal to 21.
This shows that there is only one possible polynomial g(x), namely g(x)=(x−21)8.
Log in to reply
Mind throwing some light on how you instantly came up with that inequality?