Another CMI problem: (and I could solve this)
Define polynomials \( P_n(x) \) in this way:
P0(x)=1
Pn(x)=n!x(x−1)(x−2)…(x−n) where n is a positive integer.
Prove that for any polynomial f(x), there always exist unique real numbers b0,b1,…bn such that:
f(x)=0≤i≤n∑bipi(x)
Further prove that the bi's are all integers, if it is given that f(m) is an integer for each integer m.
#Functions
#Polynomials
#Proofs
#JustForFun
#Cmi
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Other problems I found interesting:
And you thought limits were always easy
A fun problem - Find the formula of number of functions from a power set to another set
did any one get a seat in CMI (i got one wihtout interview) i solved nearly 6 of the ques....
Log in to reply
I did (without interview). Didn't expect it though! Pretty much set on joining there.
Part (a): Proving the existence and uniqueness of bi:
Let f(x)=c0+c1x+c2x2+...+cnxn and take note of the fact that:
pn(x)=(nx)(x−n). Since p0(x)=1, we may write:
∑0≤i≤n(bi)(pi(x))=(b0)+∑1≤i≤n(bi)(pi(x))
Expanding ∑1≤i≤n(bi)(pi(x)): (Without loss of generality, assume ∑1≤i≤n(bi)(pi(x))= ∑i=1n(bi)(pi(x)))
∑i=1n(bi)(pi(x)))= b1(x2−x)+2b2(x3−3x2+2x)+6b3(x4−6x3+11x2−6x)+24b4(x5−10x4+35x3−50x2+24x)+...+n!(x−n)!bnx!(x−n)
Equating coefficients of f(x), ci, with those of ∑i=1n(bi)(pi(x))):
c0=b0
c1=−b1+b2−b3+b4+....=∑i=1n(−1)ibi
c2=b1−23b2+611b3−2450b4+....
c3=2b2−b3+2435b4−....
c4=6b3−2410b4+.....
c5=24b4+....
This is a linear system of n equations (excluding c0=b0) in n unknowns. Therefore, we may construct an n x n matrix A such that: Ab=c, where b contains all bi and c contains all ci. A=
⎝⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎛−1100...012−3210...0−1611−161...0...................α1α2α3α4...αn⎠⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎞
Ab=c has a unique solution if and only if A is an invertible matrix. A is invertible if and only if det(A)=0. Then Ab=c has a unique solution if and only if det(A)=0. If we use Gaussian Elimination to reduce A, that is, if we add line (1) to line (2), then line (2) to line (3), then line (3) to line (4), etc. we see that A will be reduced to an upper triangular matrix with every term on the main diagonal of A of the form: Aji=i!−1, where i corresponds to the column number of Aji. Hence det(A)=∏i=1ni!−1.
Since det(A)=∏i=1ni!−1 and i≥1, det(A)=0. Then A is invertible and Ab=c has a unique solution, hence b=A−1c, which of course exists. This proves the existence of bi but does not prove the uniqueness of all bi. We will now proceed to prove this.
Let Aji−1 denote the element of A−1 in the jth row and ith column. Since b=A−1c, we have:
bn=An1−1c1+An2−1c2+An3−1c3+...+Ann−1cn
Suppose ∃ bi such that bi=bn but i=n, i.e. suppose all bi are not unique. Then, since bn is described by the above equation:
Ai1−1c1=An1−1c1
Ai2−1c2=An2−1c2
Ai3−1c3=An3−1c3
And in general: Ain−1cn=Ann−1cn ⇒ Ain−1=Ann−1
If Ain−1=Ann−1 and i=n, then A−1 contains at least two identical rows, which implies det(A−1)=0. Then A−1 is not invertible, which is impossible because (A−1)−1=A. This is a contradiction, hence we are forced to conclude that all bi are unique. Part (b) coming soon.
QED
Note that the polynomials Pi(x),0≤i≤n have increasing degrees and hence they are linearly independent in the vector space of polynomials of degree n. Hence they form a basis and the proof for the first part follows.
Solved this one. Nice question.
Log in to reply
How do you solve this question? Can you give the solution? Or atleast an hint
Log in to reply
Hint: Notice that Pk(x) vanishes at x=k, and also do the "higher" P's. That is, Pk+1,Pk+2 and so on. But the "lower" P's don't. If you use this properly, you're done!
Log in to reply