This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
I've managed to reduce down the problem to showing that the solutions of a2−a+1=3k in integers satisfy a≤2, but can't proceed anywhere afterwards.
Note that since a3+1=(a+1)(a2−a+1), the prime number we're looking for cannot divide a+1 and hence must divide a2−a+1. Thus it suffices to find a prime number p that divides a2−a+1 but not a+1.
However, gcd(a2−a+1,a+1)=gcd(3,a+1), thus it suffices to find some prime factor p of a2−a+1 that is not 3. If this is found, p cannot divide a+1, since if it does then p divides their GCD, but the GCD is either 1 or 3, impossible to be divisible by p whatever it is.
Also note that a2−a+1>1 for a>2, so it suffices to show that a2−a+1 is not in the form 3k for a>2, or in other words the only solutions of a2−a+1=3k in integers satisfy a≤2.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Yes.Corrected it.
Log in to reply
Ah. That makes more sense.
I've updated it to "any integer a>2" for clarity.
This is an interesting problem.
I've managed to reduce down the problem to showing that the solutions of a2−a+1=3k in integers satisfy a≤2, but can't proceed anywhere afterwards.
Note that since a3+1=(a+1)(a2−a+1), the prime number we're looking for cannot divide a+1 and hence must divide a2−a+1. Thus it suffices to find a prime number p that divides a2−a+1 but not a+1.
However, gcd(a2−a+1,a+1)=gcd(3,a+1), thus it suffices to find some prime factor p of a2−a+1 that is not 3. If this is found, p cannot divide a+1, since if it does then p divides their GCD, but the GCD is either 1 or 3, impossible to be divisible by p whatever it is.
Also note that a2−a+1>1 for a>2, so it suffices to show that a2−a+1 is not in the form 3k for a>2, or in other words the only solutions of a2−a+1=3k in integers satisfy a≤2.
Log in to reply
Great! You are 1 step away from a complete solution.
Hopefully that is a sufficient hint (and you shouldn't look down further).
If not,
Hint: If gcd(3,a+1)=3, what does that tell us about a?
Another hint: Use the quadratic formula.