i have a Probabilities Question :
We are to find the probability that when three dice are rolled at the same time, the largest value of the three numbers rolled is 4.
let A be the outcome in which the largest number is 4, let B be the outcome in which the largest number is 4 or less, and let C be the outcome in which the largest number is 3 or less.
Let P(X) denote the probability that the outcome of an event is X .Then
(1) P(B) = ........ , * P(C) = ..........*
(2) since B = A U C and the outcomes A and C are mutually exclusive it follows that P(A) = .........
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
To calculate P(B), think about how many ways we can choose an ordered triplet (a,b,c) such that each of a, b, c is at most 4. How many choices can we make for a? How many choices can we make for b? How many choices can we make for c? A little thought should show you that there are 4 choices each, and they are all independent, so there should be 43=64 such outcomes. Similarly, we can enumerate the outcomes corresponding to P(C); there should be 33=27. Therefore, the number of desired outcomes that have a maximum of exactly 4 is equal to 64 - 27 = 37. How many unrestricted possible outcomes are there? 63=216, so P(A) = 37/216.
This question is a good example of how calculating the probability mass function for an order statistic of a discrete probability distribution is made easier by considering the cumulative distribution function of the order statistic. That is to say, Pr[X(k)=x]=Pr[X(k)≤x]−Pr[X(k)≤x−1] for a distribution whose support is a subset of the integers, and it is generally easier to compute the RHS rather than trying to enumerate the LHS directly.