Hey, buddies :)
Recently people had discussion in Brilliant-Lounge on a probability problem which is:
In a family of 3 children, what is the probability that at least one will be a boy?
Some of them believe that is the correct answer while the others believe that the correct answer is .
Everyone is invited to come up with their response along with the explanation. It will be fun and help us a lot to upgrade our knowledge engine further.
Thanks!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Let B represent a boy and G represent a girl.Then,
Sample Space , S={BBB,BBG,BGB,GBB,BGG,GBG,GGB,GGG}
(Probability of having at least 1 boy) =1−(Probability of having only girls (no boys))=1−81(only 1 case out of 8 cases)=87
So According to me, correct answer is 87.
Note:-
BBG,BGB,GBB are different cases because their relative ages (order of birth) are different in each case.
(Same for BGG,GBG,GGB)
Alternate Thinking Process:-
P(B)=P(G)=21
(Probability of having at least 1 boy) =1−(Probability of having only girls (no boys))=1−21×21×21=87
Log in to reply
Yes you are right. This is the same approach what I had.
Nice approach @Yash Dev Lamba
it's an easy one :P let the birth of boy be success and girl be failure ( i'm not being an anti-feminist :P) the answer would be 3c1+3c2+3c3/(2^3)=7/8 ! easy enough :P
Log in to reply
lol.
I agree with @Yash Dev Lamba
Probability can lead to amazing paradoxes. Here is a very well known probability question often misunderstood:
A family has two children. What is the probability that they are both sons, given that a) At least one of them is a son? b) the elder child is a son?
Log in to reply
Ya , parodoxes created by probability are probably the best.
(a)1/3 (b)1/2
Simple conceptual learning condtitonal probability Probability Rocks By- YDL
@Nihar Mahajan @Sharky Kesa
What do you guys think? I would be great if you participate in this discussion as you were playing a major role in the slack discussion. Thanks!
Log in to reply
The Family cares about getting Boy, not about getting a young boy or an old boy. So, how does having two younger daughters and an elder son different from having a younger son and two elder daughters ?
How 3/4 will come?
Log in to reply
if blindly consider BBG,BGB,GBB same and BGG,GBG,GGB also same then prob. is 3/4 which is incorrect.
Log in to reply
Thanks for explaining. A wrong answer is more important than a right.
Take the complementary probability, the chance that no boys are picked. For this to happen, all girls must be picked, so the probability is (1/2)^3 = 1/8. Every other case has at least one boy, so the probability that at least one boy is chosen is 1 - 1/8 = 7/8.
Ans should be 7/8 as if we remove the case of no boys then the remaining will be atleast 1 boy i.e 1-(1/2)^3= 7/8 ☺
But there is a large assumption that boys and girls are given birth to with 0.5 probability each! That's quite huge an assumption, and it would allow any answer to be correct...
The Family cares about getting Boy, not about getting a young boy or an old boy. So, how does having two younger daughters and an elder son different from having a younger son and two elder daughters ?
I feel like the answer is 1/5
Log in to reply
Can you please give some explanation supporting your answer?
Log in to reply
Duh!! It is 4/5 because in a family of 5 (3 children 2 parents) then there is at least 1 women so at least 1 boy is 4/5
PS: I am weak in probability
Log in to reply
Don't worry. Keep practicing. You will soon be a master in combinatorics. ⌣¨
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply