Hi people! I'm new to probability and so while going through conditional probability I found the following problem which I solved by arguing directly without using any results of Conditional Probability ............unfortunately the answer wasn't given. The problem goes as:
There are 4 friends A,B,C, D and a referee. A puts a '+' or a '-' sign on a piece of paper and passes it to B who perhaps changes the sign and passes the slip to C, who may change the sign and passes it to D. D perhaps changes the sign and finally passes the slip to the referee. Suppose 2/3 is the prob. of writing a '+' by A and each of B,C,D changes the sign by prob 1/3 independently. If the referee notices a '+' sign on the slip, then find the prob that A wrote a '+' on the slip.
I would really appreciate if someone gave me the solution. Also assuming the same conditions, what would then be the ans, instead of 4 friends if n friends did the same thing.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
This is my first impression of how to solve it. I'm not sure my numbers are all right, but I'm fairly sure this should be the approach:
The chance that a referee saw '+' is the chance that it was '+' originally and was changed 0 or 2 times, or the chance that it was '-' originally and was changed 1 or 3 times.
The first of these has chance 2/3 (chance that A wrote '+') times the sum of (2/3)3 and 3⋅(1/3)2⋅2/3 (chance that it was changed 0 times or 2 times). Thus, the chance that A wrote '+' and the referee saw '+' is equal to 28/81.
The second has chance 1/3 (chance that A wrote '-') times the sum of (1/3)3 and 3⋅(2/3)2⋅1/3 (chance that it was changed 3 times or 1 time). This chance is 12/81.
Thus, the total chance that the referee saw '+' is 40/81. The chance that the referee saw '+' and A wrote '+' is 28/81, so the chance that A wrote '+' given the referee saw '+' is (28/81)/(40/81)=7/10.(Note the general identity P(A and B)=P(A)⋅P(B∣A), in this case A is that the referee saw '+' and B is the chance that A wrote '+.')
To generalize this, note that the chance that the number of changes is odd is 1 minus the chance that the number of changes is even. The only difficulty is calculating one without knowing the other. Since the chance of changing is not 1/2, the sum cannot be collapsed due to symmetry. If there are n middlemen (in this case, n=3), then the chance of no changes is given by the first, third, etc. terms in the binomial expansion of (2/3+1/3)n. The eventual answer will be the quotient of 2/3 times the even change chance and the sum of 2/3 times the even change chance plus 1/3 times the odd change chance.
Log in to reply
Thanks Alexander, thanks a lot!........My solution was HIGHLY incorrect!!
Good question man............