This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
We can also apply calculus. Define f(x)=x, then f′(x)>0,f′′(x)<0 for x>3. Then the difference between x−3−x and x+3−x is strictly negative. Similarly the difference between x−1−x and x+1−x is strictly negative. Add them up shows that (x−3−x)+(x+3−x)+(x−1−x)+(x+1−x)<0. In this case, x=2014. So the second number is larger.
Alternatively, one could solve this by binomial expansion. For x>3. Consider the expression
x⋅[(1+a)n+(1−a)n+(1+b)n+(1−b)n−4]
For ∣a∣<1,∣b∣<1.
Binomal expansion: (1±c)n=1±nc+2n(n−1)c2+….
Taking a=x3,b=x1,n=21 shows that the expression [(1+a)n+(1−a)n+(1+b)n+(1−b)n−4] is negative. With the substitution of x=2014 proves that the second number is larger.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
The second number, 42014 is larger.
We need to prove that (x−3−x)+(x+3−x)+(x−1−x)+(x+1−x)<0 for all x>3.
We want to prove that the sum of the first two terms is negative by contradiction. Suppose it's non-negative, then
(x−3−x)+(x+3−x)(x−3+x+3)−2x(x−3+x+3)2−(2x)22x+2x2−92x+2x2−92x2−94(x2−9)−36≥≥≥≥≥≥≥≥0004x4x2x4x20 Which is absurd
Thus (x−3−x)+(x+3−x)<0. Using an analogous argument, we can see that the sum of the other two terms is negative as well.
Thus the inequality in question holds true. In this case, x=2014.
We can also apply calculus. Define f(x)=x, then f′(x)>0,f′′(x)<0 for x>3. Then the difference between x−3−x and x+3−x is strictly negative. Similarly the difference between x−1−x and x+1−x is strictly negative. Add them up shows that (x−3−x)+(x+3−x)+(x−1−x)+(x+1−x)<0. In this case, x=2014. So the second number is larger.
Alternatively, one could solve this by binomial expansion. For x>3. Consider the expression x⋅[(1+a)n+(1−a)n+(1+b)n+(1−b)n−4]
For ∣a∣<1,∣b∣<1.
Binomal expansion: (1±c)n=1±nc+2n(n−1)c2+….
Taking a=x3,b=x1,n=21 shows that the expression [(1+a)n+(1−a)n+(1+b)n+(1−b)n−4] is negative. With the substitution of x=2014 proves that the second number is larger.