Problem: Prove that 31005=1(mod2011) 3^{1005} \equiv =-1 (\mod 2011)

Hello everybody, I'm having difficulty proving 3^1005 +1 is divisible by 2011, which is one step to solve this problem:

Prove that there exists x,y in {1,2,...,1005} such that x^2+3y^2-3 is divisible by 2011.

Thanks a lot.

Note by Anh Huy Nguyen
8 years, 2 months ago

No vote yet
3 votes

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

[As Zi Song pointed out, your discussion should say that 31005+1 3^{1005}+1 is divisible by 2011. Please update that.]

I'm assuming that you are familiar with concepts like Euler's Theorem and (Gauss Law of) Quadratic Reciprocity. You should be able to fill in the details. This approach is pretty standard.

[As Sambit suggested] Since 2011 is prime, we have ϕ(2011)=2010 \phi (2011) = 2010. By Euler's theorem, we know that 320101(mod2011) 3^{2010} \equiv 1 \pmod{2011} . Let 31005=x 3^{1005} = x , then 0x21(x1)(x+1)(mod2011) 0 \equiv x^2 - 1 \equiv (x-1)(x+1) \pmod{2011} , so x±1(mod2011) x \equiv \pm 1 \pmod{2011} (since 2011 is prime).

If x1(mod2011) x \equiv 1 \pmod{2011} , then [3503]2310063(mod2011) [ 3^{503} ] ^2 \equiv 3^{1006} \equiv 3 \pmod{ 2011} , so 3 is a quadratic residue. However, since 20117(mod12) 2011 \equiv 7 \pmod{12} , this contradicts the fact that the Legendre symbol (32011)=1 \left( \frac {3}{2011} \right) = -1 .

Pop quiz: Does this show that 3 is a primitive root modulo 2011? Why, or why not?

Calvin Lin Staff - 8 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

You have my gratitude, Calvin. Legendre is the least thing I think of, but I guess it's inevitable in some cases. A good lesson for me.

Anh Huy Nguyen - 8 years, 2 months ago

@ann huy N.,can u explain me your approach to the problem?

Bhargav Das - 8 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

My deepest apology, the title is what I want to prove. Many thanks to Zi Song Y.

@Bhargav D: This is my approach to the original problem. Let A={1,2,...,1005} A=\{1,2,...,1005\} .

Consider two sets B={x23xA};C={3y2yA} B=\{ x^2 - 3 | x \in A\} ; C=\{ -3y^2 | y \in A\} .

It's easy to see that:

  • No two elements of B are (mod2011) \equiv (\mod 2011) . The same for C.

  • No element of C is divisible by 2011. The same for B (1).

(1) is not obvious and needs to be proven. Still the only way I can think of is, assume there is a number x in A satisfying x232011x23x2010310051 x^2 - 3 \vdots 2011 \Rightarrow x^2 \equiv 3 \Rightarrow x^{2010} \equiv 3^{1005} \equiv -1 , which contradicts Fermat's theory x20101(mod2011) x^{2010} \equiv 1 (\mod 2011).

So to prove (1) we need to prove 310051 3^{1005} \equiv -1 , which is true but ....

Continuing with the original problem. We consider 2 cases:

Case 1: There are two numbers aB,bC a \in B, b \in C satisfying abx333y2 a \equiv b \Rightarrow x^3 - 3 \equiv -3y^2 (QED).

Case 2: For all aB,bC a \in B, b \in C, a and b are not (mod2011) \equiv (\mod 2011) :

Since B=C=1005BC |B|=|C|=1005 \Rightarrow B \cup C is a set of 2010 elements, and can be expressed as T={a1,a2,...,a2010} T=\{a_1,a_2,...,a_{2010} \} where aii(mod2011) a_i \equiv i (\mod 2011) .

Therefore xTxi=12010i0(mod2011)\sum_{x \in T} x \equiv \sum_{i=1}^{2010}i \equiv 0 ( \mod 2011) However, by calculation, xTx\sum_{x \in T} x is not divisible by 2011.

(Its exact result is 30152i=11005i2 -3015 - 2\sum_{i=1}^{1005} i^2 )

Anh Huy Nguyen - 8 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

This problem depends on how you think about it, and what you know.

For example, I simply set x=2,y±3502(mod2011) x =2, y\equiv \pm 3^{502} \pmod{2011} (where I use ±\pm to ensure that it lies in the domain). This gives

x2+3y234+3×31004331005+10(mod2011) x^2 + 3y^2 - 3 \equiv 4 + 3 \times 3^{1004} - 3 \equiv 3^{1005} + 1\equiv 0 \pmod{2011}

Calvin Lin Staff - 8 years, 2 months ago

thanks.

Bhargav Das - 8 years, 2 months ago

psi(2011)=2010=2*1005. Maybe you can use this.

Sambit Senapati - 8 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

201131005+12011 \mid 3^{1005} + 1 or 20113100512011 \mid 3^{1005} - 1

Zi Song Yeoh - 8 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Anh Huy N. Do you want to prove the latter or the former? Your title contradicts what you said.

Zi Song Yeoh - 8 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Zi Song Yeoh By Wolfram Alpha, you want to prove the former. :)

Zi Song Yeoh - 8 years, 2 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...