This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
(Assuming I'm interpreting you correctly,) the essence of what you're asking here is:
If an,bn are sequences of (positive) reals, such that an≥bn, does limanbn exist?
If yes, why?
If no, what is a counter example? What other assumptions do we need to add to guarantee a true statement?
@Calvin Lin
–
The answer to the limit question is yes for this case, using the same argument which is used for limx→∞exx.... and I'm looking for the summation
@Hjalmar Orellana Soto
–
See How to ask for help to understand how to provide proper context of what you want. E.g. You can see that people quickly established the inequality, but that doesn't help with your concern.
@Calvin Lin
–
The summation is something else, something I supposed and now I'm trying to approach, and I think the inequality may help for knowing if the summation converges... and then I'll try to approach the value of the summation, I don't know if I'm explaining right...
Asymptotically, 1+2+⋯+n can be approximated by the integral
∫0nxdx=32n3/2.
And of course,
1+2+⋯+n=2n(n+1).
That should help answer your question.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
for n≥2 it can be easily proven by applying triangle inequality recursively
assume a,b,c are three terms in the seuence
we have a+b≥a+b as a,b,a+b form sides of a right triangle
now we have a+b+c≥a+b+c≥a+b+c and so on....
sum of each of the outer sides of the spiral form the LHS of the equation,and RHS is given by the line to centre
also note that for n=1 the line to centre is same as side, the only point of equality
Log in to reply
very nice solution, Anirudh
Log in to reply
thank you :)
LHS2=1+2+⋯+k+2∑1≤x<y≤nxy≥1+2+⋯+n=RHS2 and equallity occurs when n=1
We want to prove that 1+2+⋯+n≥1+2+⋯+n. Squaring the left-hand side, we get a term of k⋅k=k for each 1≤k≤n. The inequality follows.
In addition to the problem.... Is this necessary information for saying that the limit below converges? x→∞limn=1∑xnn=1∑xn
Log in to reply
(Assuming I'm interpreting you correctly,) the essence of what you're asking here is:
Log in to reply
Exactly that is what I ask, I was thinking of asking for the value of n=1∑∞(∑k=1nn∑k=1nn) but I really don't know how to approach it
Log in to reply
limanbn exist?" is no for general sequences. Do you see an obvious counter example?
The answer to "doesFor your recent comment, are you looking for the summation, or for the limit of the term (as in the prior comment)?
Log in to reply
limx→∞exx.... and I'm looking for the summation
The answer to the limit question is yes for this case, using the same argument which is used forLog in to reply
How to ask for help to understand how to provide proper context of what you want. E.g. You can see that people quickly established the inequality, but that doesn't help with your concern.
SeeLog in to reply
Asymptotically, 1+2+⋯+n can be approximated by the integral ∫0nx dx=32n3/2. And of course, 1+2+⋯+n=2n(n+1). That should help answer your question.