recently i was doing some prove problems where there was a question which was to be proved by the indirect proof method. But i am a little puzzled about when to use the indirect proof method. Could anyone help over that plzzzz!!!
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
ya thats a great one , but it do not provide the condition when we can use the indirect proof .
i was doing a problem of circles which was done by contradiction . the question asked " prove that the perpendicular bisectors of 2 chords in a circle C(O,r) meet at the center of that circle " So here they just assume to take the point of intersection of the perpendicular bisectors away from the center and then they proved it by contradiction . So i am just asking for some special cases where one could always apply the contradiction .
@megh choksi
Theorem says The perpendicular from the center of a circle to a chord bisects the chord. And contradiction can be used if we have sufficient conditions to contradict means depend's upon the problem.
There's no such thing as a "list of all problems that require proof by contradiction". So, you can't look at a problem and immediately go, "Hey, I know! I'm going to use contradiction here."
Sometimes you have to ask yourself, "Does negating the conclusion help me in some way? Does it give me something easier to work with?" If the answers are 'yes', you should definitely try a contradiction argument.
Being able to determine what approach will work for a certain problem also comes with experience. When you first learn about a topic, say induction, you don't immediately know if a certain problem can be approached using induction. As you learn and become more experienced, you develop some sort of intuition that allows you to say, "Hey, I think if I do this and this, an induction proof might work."
Also check out the heading titled "motivation" in the same wiki for more details.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
@Palash Som Check out this wiki by Mursalin Habib
Log in to reply
ya thats a great one , but it do not provide the condition when we can use the indirect proof . i was doing a problem of circles which was done by contradiction . the question asked " prove that the perpendicular bisectors of 2 chords in a circle C(O,r) meet at the center of that circle " So here they just assume to take the point of intersection of the perpendicular bisectors away from the center and then they proved it by contradiction . So i am just asking for some special cases where one could always apply the contradiction . @megh choksi
Log in to reply
Theorem says The perpendicular from the center of a circle to a chord bisects the chord. And contradiction can be used if we have sufficient conditions to contradict means depend's upon the problem.
Log in to reply
I think I understand what you're trying to say.
There's no such thing as a "list of all problems that require proof by contradiction". So, you can't look at a problem and immediately go, "Hey, I know! I'm going to use contradiction here."
Sometimes you have to ask yourself, "Does negating the conclusion help me in some way? Does it give me something easier to work with?" If the answers are 'yes', you should definitely try a contradiction argument.
Being able to determine what approach will work for a certain problem also comes with experience. When you first learn about a topic, say induction, you don't immediately know if a certain problem can be approached using induction. As you learn and become more experienced, you develop some sort of intuition that allows you to say, "Hey, I think if I do this and this, an induction proof might work."
Also check out the heading titled "motivation" in the same wiki for more details.
Log in to reply