Hi guys! Today I discovered my own proof for the Angle sum property of a triangle. (Or so I think)
The proof goes like this.
1) Take a triangle ABC. Draw an angle bisector AD to the side BC.
2) Let Angle BAD=Angle DAC= , Angle ABC= and Angle ACB =
3) Angle ADC= [External angle=Sum of both interior angles]
4) Similarly, Angle ADB =
5) [Angles on a straight line]
6) Angle A+Angle B + Angle C =
Thus proved.
Please leave your comments in the box below. Kindly tell me if this proof has already been derived by someone :)
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I would argue that you can't actually "prove" this because the angle sum property is basically the same as the parallel postulate which is independent of the first four postulates. You can even have geometries where the angle sum property does not hold.
Log in to reply
So can we say, That this is valid for the "Commonly used" Geometry? :P
Log in to reply
It is the characteristic axiom of Euclidean geometry. Other geometries that do not have this are called non-Euclidean geometries.
Well, I had derived this as a solution to a textbook problem when I was of your age. By the way, good work.
Log in to reply
Thank you! :D
In step 3, isn't the fact that the external angle is the sum of the other two interior angles actually equivalent to the angle sum property for a triangle? You're saying 180∘−∠ACD=a∘+b∘ since they are the internal angles of a triangle, after all.
Can you alter your proof so that none of the steps assume that the sum of the internal angles of a triangle is 180∘?
U used Exterior Angle Property which is proved by ASP. Hence this is wrong. :)
Log in to reply
I assumed we know Exterior angle property :P
Log in to reply
Assuming something in a proof is wrong.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply