Here's another proof of Euler reflection formula :
Lemma1:
P(n):i=1∏n(x−ai)1=i=1∑n(x−ai)1j=1,j=i∏n(ai−aj)1 for all n belonging to N
Proof :
I will prove it by induction :
It can be easily verified that P(1) is true :
Assume P(n) is true :
than i=1∏n(x−ai)1=i=1∑n(x−ai)1j=1,j=i∏n(ai−aj)1
Multiplying both sides with (x−an+1)1 we have :
i=1∏n+1(x−ai)1=i=1∑n(x−ai)1((x−an+1)1j=1,j=i∏n(ai−aj)1)
It is easy to check that :
(x−ai)1(x−an+1)1=(ai−an+1)1(x−ai)1+(an+1−ai)1(x−an+1)1
Using this we have :
i=1∏n+1(x−ai)1=i=1∑n(x−ai)1j=1,j=i∏n+1(ai−aj)1+(x−an+1)1i=1∑n(an+1−ai)1j=1,j=i∏nai−aj1
Now using P(n) we can say that :
i=1∑n(an+1−ai)1j=1,j=i∏nai−aj1=i=1∏n(an+1−ai)1=i=1,i=n+1∏n+1(an+1−ai)1
Using this in our upper result we have :
i=1∏n+1(x−ai)1=i=1∑n(x−ai)1j=1,j=i∏n+1(ai−aj)1+(x−an+1)1j=1,j=n+1∏n+1an+1−aj1=i=1∑n+1(x−ai)1j=1,j=i∏n+1(ai−aj)1
Hence P(n) is true implies P(n+1) is true implies P(n) is true for all n belongs to N
Lemma2:
j=1,j=i∏n(ai−aj)1=P′(ai)1, where P(x) is a monic polynomial having roots {ak}, for 1≤k≤n
Proof :
P(x)=j=1∏n(x−aj)
Dividing both sides by (x−ai) and taking limit x→ai we have :
x→ailimx−aiP(x)=j=1,j=i∏n(ai−aj)
Applying L-Hopitals rule we have our result :
Now we start with the integral :
I(n)=∫0∞1+xndx
Let it's roots be {ak}, for 1≤k≤n
Then we have :
I(n)=∫0∞j=1∏n(x−aj)1dx
Applying lemma 1 we have :
I(n)=∫0∞i=1∑n(x−ai)1j=1,j=i∏n(ai−aj)1dx
Applying lemma 2 we have :
I(n)=∫0∞i=1∑n(x−ai)1nain−11dx
Using the fact that ain=−1 we have :
−n1∫0∞i=1∑n(x−ai)aidx
Changing the order of integration and summation and integrating it we have :
I(n)=n1p→∞limi=1∑nailn(x−ai)∣p0
I(n)=n1(i=1∑nailn(−ai)−p→∞limi=1∑nln(p−ai))
Now p→∞limi=1∑nailn(p−ai)=p→∞limln(p)i=1∑nai−i=1∑nailn(1−pai)=0
Here we have used the fact that sum of roots is 0 and applied the limit.
Now the value of our integral becomes :
I(n)=n1(i=1∑nailn(−ai))=n1(i=1∑nailn(ai)+ln(−1)i=1∑nai)=n1(i=1∑nailn(ai))
Using the general form of root ak=e(2(2k−1)πi)
Our integral becomes :
I(n)=n1(k=1∑nn(2k−1)πien(2k−1)πi)=n2enπi2πik=1∑nken2πik
Here I have again used the fact that sum of roots is 0.
Using the concept of Arithmetic-Geometric series it can be easily shown that :
k=1∑nkxk=(1−x)2x(xn−1)−1−xnxn+1
Using this we have :
I(n)=nenπi2πi(en2πi−1en2πi)
Simplifying it we get :
I(n)=nπcscnπ
Again back to our integral :
I(n)=∫0∞1+xndx
Use the substitution y=1+xndx, we have :
I(n)=n1∫01yn−1(1−y)n1−1dy
By defintion of beta function this evaluates to :
I(n)=n1Γ(1)Γ(n1)Γ(1−n1)
Comparing our two results we have :
n1Γ(n1)Γ(1−n1)=nπcscnπ
I have used Γ(1)=1
Finally we have :
Γ(n1)Γ(1−n1)=πcscnπ
Take n1=x to get :
Γ(x)Γ(1−x)=πcscπx
HENCEPROVED
Sorry for the fact that the proof looks too messy, and that I have jumped many steps. It's largely based on manipulations on complex numbers.
#Calculus
#GammaFunction
#BetaFunction
#ReflectionFormula
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Great! Can you put that inside here?
Nice. And I really appreciate your patience while writing LATEX
Log in to reply
Thanks, how's the proof.
Log in to reply
It's really nice . And since I am talking to jee topper and I am aspirant for JEE 2016 , I would like to ask the same question, which books do you referred to in Inorganic , Is it all about just remembering things up or analysing the concept of reaction mechanism ?
Isn't there a proof for lemma 1 which doesn't use induction?
Log in to reply
Note that in Lemma 1 after multiplying both sides by i=1∏n(x−ai) and subtracting 1 from both sides, the polynomial generated on R.H.S. is of n−1 degrees, but has n roots. Thus it is an identity. See Lagrange's Interpolation Polynomial.
Log in to reply
Thanks!
You can try that for yourself.
It is obvious if you use covering lemma
Did you mean Γ(1)=1?
Also, your prove only shows that the Euler reflection formula is valid for x=n1, where n is an integer more than 0.
Great prove though.
Log in to reply
I know, I am trying to generalize this.
Can you explain how you got to that step after you wrote 'using this we have' in the first lemma?