Proof of Minkowski's inequality

this follows from Holder's inequality,and in my proof,for the sake of simplicity,i'll use it

Minkowski's inequality states that

\(\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ ({ x }_{ n }+{ y }_{ n })^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } }\le (\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { x }_{ n }^{ p } } ) } ^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } }+(\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { y }_{ n }^{ p } } )^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } }\)

for p>1p>1

and xn,yn0{x}_{n},{y}_{n}\ge0


Proof:

we know

n=1k(xn+yn)p=n=1kxn(xn+yn)p1+n=1kyn(xn+yn)p1\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ ({ x }_{ n }+{ y }_{ n })^{ p }=\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { x }_{ n }({ x }_{ n }+{ y }_{ n })^{ p-1 } } } +\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { y }_{ n }({ x }_{ n }+{ y }_{ n } } )^{ p-1 }

let's define aa as a=pp1a=\frac { p }{ p-1 } now by Holder's inequality we have

n=1kxn(xn+yn)p1+n=1kyn(xn+yn)p1((n=1kxnp)1p+(n=1kynp)1p)((n=1k(xk+yk)p)1a)=((n=1kxnp)1p+(n=1kynp)1p)(n=1k(xn+yn)p)1a\displaystyle \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^k x_n \left({x_n + y_n}\right)^{p-1} + \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^k y_n \left({x_n + y_n}\right)^{p-1}\le((\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { x }_{ n }^{ p } } )^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } }+(\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { y }_{ n }^{ p } } )^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } })((\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ ({ x }_{ k }+{ y }_{ k })^{ p })^{ \frac { 1 }{ a } } } )=\\((\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { x }_{ n }^{ p } } )^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } }+(\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { y }_{ n }^{ p } } )^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } })(\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ ({ x }_{ n }+{ y }_{ n })^{ p } } )^{ \frac { 1 }{ a } }

dividing by n=1k(xn+yn)p)1a\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ ({ x }_{ n }+{ y }_{ n })^{ p } } )^{ \frac { 1 }{ a } }

we get

n=1k(xn+yn)1p(n=1kxnp)1p+(n=1kynp)1p\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ ({ x }_{ n }+{ y }_{ n })^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } }\le (\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { x }_{ n }^{ p } } ) } ^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } }+(\displaystyle\sum _{ n=1 }^{ k }{ { y }_{ n }^{ p } } )^{ \frac { 1 }{ p } }

Hence proved

#Algebra

Note by Hamza A
5 years, 3 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Can someone clearly prove for what conditions do we have the equality?

Jakub Bober - 4 years, 9 months ago

very good job dude :O

Natanael Flores - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

thanks :)

i tried 2 proofs,one was just too long,so i went with the simpler one :)

Hamza A - 5 years, 3 months ago

Great proof!!!!

shivam mishra - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

thanks!

Hamza A - 5 years, 3 months ago

You should post your findings in the wiki page, hölder's inequality.

Pi Han Goh - 5 years, 3 months ago

Give introduction to minkowski's inequality

Supreetha Gowda - 2 years, 8 months ago

The term to the left in your result should be [sum((xn+yn)^p)]^(1/p), so what you have written is wrong here as a result.

Ishan Pathak - 9 months, 1 week ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...