Here I list some problems,which I got while practicing. Help is solicited. Thanks. (The discussion has been updated, you may check out the comments for the previous problems I posted)
Prove that given any prime , there exist infinitely many positive integers , such that .
If every point of the plane is painted one of three colors, do there necessarily exist two points of the same color exactly one inch apart?
Let is an odd integer. Show that the sequence
has an odd number of odd integers.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
If A,B,C are odd integers and ba is a root of AX2+BX+C=0, where a,b are coprime integers, then Aa2+Bab+Cb2=0. But since A,B,C are all odd and a,b are coprime (and so not both even) Aa2+Bab+Cb2 must be odd, giving you a contradiction.
Log in to reply
Thanks. Nice solution to both (1) & (2).
The sum of the numbers from 1 to 50 is 1275, which is odd. Thus if A is any subset of {1,2,…,50} and A′={1,2,…,50}\A is its complement, then the sum of the elements in A and the sum of the elements in A′ together add to the odd number 1275, and hence one must be even and the other odd. Thus the operation of complementation is a bijective map from the set of subsets of {1,2,…,50} with odd sum to the set of subsets of {1,2,…,50} with even sum. Since there are 250 subsets of {1,2,…,50}, exactly half of them, namely 249, have an odd sum.
Log in to reply
Doesn't the result in problem 2 follow directly from symmetry?
EDIT: Never mind, your proof is a more rigorous version of mine. :)
Perfect. Thank you sir. Can't believe these proofs were so trivial.
3.
Base Case : When n=1;
111 is divisible by 3.
Inductive Case : If 11…11 with 3n digits is divisible by 3n,
For n+1, 11…11 with 3n+1 digits
=11…11+11…1100…00+11…1100…00
With the first term having 3n 1's, the second term 3n 1's and 0's, and the last term with 3n 1's and 2∗3n 0's.
=11…11(1+103n+102∗3n)
=11…11(10…010…01)
The first part is divisible by 3n and the second by 3. Therefore, their product is divisible by 3n+1
4.
gcd(n2+20,n2+2n+21)
Subtracting the first term from the second,
=gcd(n2+20,2n+1)
Multiplying the first term with 4 won't change the gcd since 2n + 1 is odd.
=gcd(4n2+80,2n+1)
Dividing the first term by the second
=gcd(81,2n+1)
Since the gcd is the greatest common DIVISOR of 81 and 2n + 1, it will divide 81.
5.
Applying the Euclidean Division lemma to p and 30, we get,
p=30q+r,0≤r<30
If r is divisble by 2,3 or 5, It would imply p is divisible by 2,3 or 5, which is not possible. Therefore r is not divisible by 2,3 or 5.But every composite number below 30 contains a factor of 2,3 or 5. Therefore r is prime or equal to 1
Log in to reply
Awesome! Check back for some updates to this thread. I myself got Q4 2 hours after I posted. Thanks!
Typo: 7th line end: It should be 2∗3n 0's,
Log in to reply
Thanks. Corrected.
Some previous problems:- (As such, Mark H. & Siddhartha S. have already given perfect solutions to these.)
In the identity x(x+1)(x+2)...(x+n)n!=k=0∑nx+kAk, prove that: Ak=(−1)k(kn).
If the coefficients of a quadratic equation are all odd integers, show that its roots can not be rational.
Show that the number 11...11 with 3n digits is divisible by 3n.
For a natural number n, let an=n2+20. Show that gcd(an,an+1)∣81.
Show that if a prime number is divided by 30, then the remainder is either a prime or 1.
Log in to reply
Now the problem is equivalent to showing that b2−4ac is not a perfect square. Because ac is odd b2−4ac is congruent to b2+4 modulo 8. But because b is odd b2=1+8k⟹b2−4ac=5+8k witch is not a perfect square because 5 is not a quadratic residue (mod8)Q.E.D
Log in to reply
EDIT: this is for problem 2 not 1.
#2 From symmetry one can conclude that the number of subsets with odd sum of elements is equal to the number of subsets with even sum of elements. Since there are a total of 250 subsets, it immediately follows that there are 249 subsets with odd element sum.
EDIT: @Paramjit I used that idea. I'm sorry, I just provided a bare sketch of a proof.
Log in to reply
Mark H. has used the same basic idea perfectly. You need to show that sum of the numbers from 1 to n is odd, here, else your proof is not complete. (In general, it is easy to know from Mark's solution that "If n=2k=k+k is even, number of odd-sum subsets outnumbers the even-sum subsets when k is odd & opposite when k is even (as n=4k′=2k′+2k′).")