This image was sourced and then altered from the NASA image archive. The chimpanzee pictured was named Ham the Astrochimp. He was a brave space pioneer and proved to NASA that astronauts would be able to survive space travel.
This post requires familiarity with complex numbers, in particular i=−1, and i2=−1.
We know thatDividing across, we getTaking square roots, we getHence,Multiplying out denominators, we getHence,1×1=(−1)×(−1)−11=1−1−11=1−1i1=1i1×1=i×i1=1×1=i×i=−1(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6).
What went wrong? At which step did we go wrong? You can review the discussion to understand the subtleties of the proof.
Related to this is the following 'proof' that 1=3.
We know thatTaking logarithms, we getSince log(−1)=0, we can divide bylog(−1)(−1)1=−1=(−1)31×log(−1)=3×log(−1)1=3(1)(2)(3)
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
the mistake in 1st proof is that we cant take root of negative numbers because no two same numbers when multiplied would give a -ve number and the mistake in 2nd is that log is not defined for -ve numbers because
if in the case of natural log, the base is e hence as e is +ve so e raised to any thing would be always be +ve .
You're right. I would like to add that when teacher teach about complex numbers they don't mention that -i is also a solution for x2+1=0. In the complex numbers we also can't compare numbers so we don't really have a sign, (eg what's the square root of (2−i)2 is it 2−i or −2+1) that's why the square root can only be calculated for positive numbers.
What do you mean IF i2=−1?! it CAN'T be -1! You might as well be saying if (idiotic BS)=-1, then (idioticBS)1 = -(idiotic BS). What is -1 x -1? Perhaps you need a calculator to figure that out. A negative Times a negative is a positive. A positive times a positive is a positive. There is NO WAY that ANY negative number can be squared to become a negative number. Since that is a mathematical impossibility it makes absolutely no sense to then use it in any equation as if it is not a mathematical impossibility in order to prove some other impossibility. No matter how much you may Claim to be able to fly, when you leap off a tall building you will still go splat!
But 3−1= -1, And 13−1=3−11, I checked on my calculator, they are both -1. That still doesn't mean that 1=-1, it only means that a Negative times a Positive is a Negative! Basically what this is saying is that -1/1=-1 AND 1/-1=-1. Why is that? Because a negative times a negative is a positive, AND a negative times a positive is a negative. Both rules are well known, and neither proves that 1=-1. However you Can say that |1|=|-1|, and be completely correct.
Just because 1/-1=-1/1 that does NOT mean that 1x1=-1x-1=-1, that would be very plainly wrong. -1x-1=1! 1/-1=-1, -1/1=-1, 1x1=1, -1x-1=1, so Yes, both sets of equations are true, but one set's answer is NOT the same as the other set's. 1 does NOT equal -1. Not by any so-called mathematical proof.
The logarithmic so-called proof is wrong as well, my calculator says 1×log(−1) is a math error. No matter how much you manipulate mathematically impossible things you can never make them prove another mathematical impossibility. Logarithms have to do with multiplications too. The only way to get -1 is by multiplying −1×−1×−1, etc. etc. into infinity as long as it's an odd number of multiplications. But if I put in log−1(−1) in my calculator, it gives me an error. Why? Because it's trying to find the exponent that gives the answer of -1, but Every Odd Exponent would do that! Can't be done on the calculator, too much to do. So what? No matter the exponent you choose, that still doesn't mean that 1=3!! BS! −11=−1, −13=−1, −15=−1, −17=−1, −19=−1, −111=−1, etc. etc. So.......... yah, 1 is not 3. Oh, and since 1×log(−1) is giving an error and is therefore impossible to resolve to an actual number, you can not divide anything by it! That's like dividing something by infinity! And what, exactly, are you dividing by infinity in order to get 3? Since you can't multiply anything by infinity and get any kind of real number to work with, you might as well just say infinity equals infinity, which is true. 1=3 is not true. Period, end of discussion.
@Aaron Ingebrigtsen
–
i is an imaginary mathematical number that can solve certain equations and therefore, i^4 (aka 1) / i^1 (aka i) = i^(4-1) = i^3 = iii = -1 * i = -i
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
ba=ba is not valid for complex numbers
the mistake in 1st proof is that we cant take root of negative numbers because no two same numbers when multiplied would give a -ve number and the mistake in 2nd is that log is not defined for -ve numbers because if in the case of natural log, the base is e hence as e is +ve so e raised to any thing would be always be +ve .
Log in to reply
You're right. I would like to add that when teacher teach about complex numbers they don't mention that -i is also a solution for x2+1=0. In the complex numbers we also can't compare numbers so we don't really have a sign, (eg what's the square root of (2−i)2 is it 2−i or −2+1) that's why the square root can only be calculated for positive numbers.
(i)Infirstproof,ba=qp⇏ba=qpbecausemaybeba=−qp(ii)Insecondproof,log(x)onlydefinedforx>0
ba=ba , only if a and b are both positive or both negative...
And if exactly one of a and b is positive, then
ba=i.∣b∣∣a∣.
You can say that i am trying to make a new rule , which would give its best to control some functionings of such expressions.
One rule I know is a.b=a.b ; if and only if at least one of a and b is non-negative. And the second rule may be which i discussed above :P
in second proof we cannot use negative numbers as it not in domain of logarithmic function
i can't get the first proof.. base from my teacher's teaching, you should divide the same #.
So..
if...
11 = (-1)(-1)
then,
(1*1)/(-1) = ((-1)(-1))/(-1)
And my teavher says.. YOU CAN'T DIVIDE ACROSS.. Joke.. justmy induction.. :)
second...
Log (base -1) (-1) = 1 -----> (Log -1)/(Log -1) = 1 ----> Log (-1) = (Log -1)
And:
Log (base -1) (1) = 3 ------> (Log -1)/(Log 1) = 3 ----> Log (-1) = 3 (Log 1)
By means of their similarity,
(Log -1) = 3 ( Log 1)
1.36437635 i = 3(0)
1.36437635 i ≠ 0
So...
the 1 = 3 is wrong.. :3
What about something like this:
We know that i2=i6=−1 and i=−1
Combining, we get i=i6=i26=i3hence,i=i3
Since i=0 we can divide ii3=1
And ii3=i3−1=i2=−1
Therefore, we conclude 1=−1
We can not divide by an imaginary number.
Log in to reply
Why not? If i2=−1, then we have i1=−i.
Log in to reply
What do you mean IF i2=−1?! it CAN'T be -1! You might as well be saying if (idiotic BS)=-1, then (idioticBS)1 = -(idiotic BS). What is -1 x -1? Perhaps you need a calculator to figure that out. A negative Times a negative is a positive. A positive times a positive is a positive. There is NO WAY that ANY negative number can be squared to become a negative number. Since that is a mathematical impossibility it makes absolutely no sense to then use it in any equation as if it is not a mathematical impossibility in order to prove some other impossibility. No matter how much you may Claim to be able to fly, when you leap off a tall building you will still go splat!
But 3−1= -1, And 13−1=3−11, I checked on my calculator, they are both -1. That still doesn't mean that 1=-1, it only means that a Negative times a Positive is a Negative! Basically what this is saying is that -1/1=-1 AND 1/-1=-1. Why is that? Because a negative times a negative is a positive, AND a negative times a positive is a negative. Both rules are well known, and neither proves that 1=-1. However you Can say that |1|=|-1|, and be completely correct.
Just because 1/-1=-1/1 that does NOT mean that 1x1=-1x-1=-1, that would be very plainly wrong. -1x-1=1! 1/-1=-1, -1/1=-1, 1x1=1, -1x-1=1, so Yes, both sets of equations are true, but one set's answer is NOT the same as the other set's. 1 does NOT equal -1. Not by any so-called mathematical proof.
The logarithmic so-called proof is wrong as well, my calculator says 1×log(−1) is a math error. No matter how much you manipulate mathematically impossible things you can never make them prove another mathematical impossibility. Logarithms have to do with multiplications too. The only way to get -1 is by multiplying −1×−1×−1, etc. etc. into infinity as long as it's an odd number of multiplications. But if I put in log−1(−1) in my calculator, it gives me an error. Why? Because it's trying to find the exponent that gives the answer of -1, but Every Odd Exponent would do that! Can't be done on the calculator, too much to do. So what? No matter the exponent you choose, that still doesn't mean that 1=3!! BS! −11=−1, −13=−1, −15=−1, −17=−1, −19=−1, −111=−1, etc. etc. So.......... yah, 1 is not 3. Oh, and since 1×log(−1) is giving an error and is therefore impossible to resolve to an actual number, you can not divide anything by it! That's like dividing something by infinity! And what, exactly, are you dividing by infinity in order to get 3? Since you can't multiply anything by infinity and get any kind of real number to work with, you might as well just say infinity equals infinity, which is true. 1=3 is not true. Period, end of discussion.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@Aaron Ingebrigtsen
thats why i is called an imaginary number not a real number