It's unknown:
1.- if there are an infinite number of primes of the form
2.- if a prime can always be found between and (Hardy and Wright 1979, p. 415; Ribenboim 1996, pp. 397-398). These are two of Landau's problems..
This note is written to address these two problems using computers as a tool (creating programs to evaluate, for example, if 2 is true between to , for finding primes of the form between to ), and with the help of Brilliant Comunity. We are interested in any information or guideline related to these two problem.
For instance, approaching the conjeture, I can say : This is just a very, very humble beginning:
1.-
are prime numbers fullfiling 1, and are in arithmetic progression. Nevertheless, is not a prime number. What happens with ? What happens with the numbers of the form ?.....
2.-
Between and there are 2 primes (2,3).
Between and there are 2 primes (5,7).
Between and there are 2 primes (11,13).
Between and there are 3 primes (17,19,23).
Between and there are 2 primes (29,31).
Between and there are 4 primes ...
Between and there are 3 primes...
Between and there are 4 primes...
Between and there are 3 primes...
The conjeture is true for the first 1000 numbers...
I hope this note continue and hopefully we succeed among all.
P.S.- I'm not going to answer every questions about this... This is not the proposal of this note.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
1.- Reductio ad absurdum:
Suppose there are a finite numbers of primes of the form n2+1=4k2+1. Call p the greatest prime of the 4k2+1⇒p2 only have 3 factors: 1,p,p2=16k4+8k2+1. Of course, p2+1 is not a prime becuase is an even number, and p is an odd number. Suppose p2+1=2m⇒2m−1=p2⇒p2−1=(p−1)(p+1)=2(m−1) ⇒m−1 is an even number ⇒m=2l+1⇒p2=4l+1⇒4k4+2k2=2k2(2k2+1)=l⇒p2=8r+1. Now, we have 3 possibilities:
a) r≡1 mod 3 ⇒p2 is divisible by 3 (Contradicition)
b) r≡0 mod 3 ⇒p2=24q+1 with r=3q. Nevertheless, 24∣p2−1, ∀p>3 prime. go here. This implies that 3∣p2−1. Conclusion: 3∣p−1 or 3∣p+1. This was obvious...
c) r≡2 mod 3 ⇒p2=24q+17⇒24∣p2−17 (contradiction wit th b)). So, we have so far,
p=n2+1 with p the greatest prime number which can be written of this form, and 24q=p2−1=(p−1)(p+1)=n2(n2+2). If 3∣p−1=n2 then 9∣n2 because of fundamental theorem of arithmetic and hence 72∣p2−1 because 8∣p2−1 and 9∣p2−1 with gcd(8,9)=1, or 3∣n2+2=4k2+2⇒k≡1mod 3 ⇒p=4k2+1=3s+2. The diophantine equation 4x−3y=1 has infintely many solutions of the form (x=1+3λ,y=1+4λ). This implies that k2=1+3λ⇒p=5+12λ=3s+2. Let p1>p be a prime number, then there doesn't exist an even natural number n1 that p1=n12+1=4a2+1
Fermat's theorem on the sum of two squares says:
For odd prime p ∃ x,y∈Z∣p=x2+y2 if and only if p≡1mod4
There are infinite prime numbers of the form 4n+1. Go here. Let p1>p be a prime of the form p1=4n+1⇒p1=4n+1=n12+1, ∀n1∈N⇒n12=4k⇒k=a2. This means that an infinite primes greater than p is of the form 4k+1 then k is not a perfect square... To be continued