Proving a zeta function identity.

Prove the following:

ζ(2)2+ζ(4)23+ζ(6)25+ζ(8)27+=1\frac{\zeta(2) }{2}+\frac{\zeta (4)}{2^3}+\frac{\zeta (6)}{2^5}+\frac{\zeta (8)}{2^7}+\cdots=1

Note: There's a very elegant proof to this which doesn't use integral calculus and uses only changing of summation order and telescoping sum. Can you find it?


This note was inspired by a friend who wanted me to post more problems for the community.

#Calculus #Identity #TelescopingSeries #RiemannZetaFunction #Proofs

Note by Prasun Biswas
6 years, 1 month ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

@Nihar Mahajan, you happy now? :3

Prasun Biswas - 6 years, 1 month ago

@Prasun Biswas consider ζ(s)=n=11ns\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \dfrac{1}{n^s} the required summation is 2s=1n=11(2n)2s=2n=11(2n)21=n=1(12n112n+1)=12\sum_{s=1}^\infty \sum_{n=1}^\infty \dfrac{1}{(2n)^{2s}}=2\sum_{n=1}^\infty \dfrac{1}{(2n)^2-1}\\ =\sum_{n=1}^\infty\left( \dfrac{1}{2n-1}-\dfrac{1}{2n+1}\right) = 1

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Yup, this is indeed the intended solution. +1 :)

You should, however, elaborate your solution to mention all the non-trivial steps taken in your solution. For example, don't just start with the double sum. It would be much better to show how the double sum form is obtained.

S=s=1ζ(2s)22s1=2s=1ζ(2s)22s=2s=1n=11n2s22s=2s=1n=11(2n)2sS=\sum_{s=1}^\infty\frac{\zeta(2s)}{2^{2s-1}}=2\sum_{s=1}^\infty\frac{\zeta(2s)}{2^{2s}}=2\sum_{s=1}^\infty\frac{\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\dfrac{1}{n^{2s}}}{2^{2s}}=2\sum_{s=1}^\infty\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{(2n)^{2s}}

Also, a brief mention of the interchange of summation order and why is it allowed here would be nice.

Prasun Biswas - 5 years, 4 months ago

The answer is kind off obvious after you mentioned manipulating sums, but wouldn't you first have to show that (a) the sum is finite and has a limit of 1 and (b) that rearrangement is allowed. IIRC, you can't just rearrange terms.

Siddhartha Srivastava - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

a) I think you can use ratio test to verify that the sum absolutely converges.

b) Rearrangement is allowed here by a special case of Tonelli's theorem which you'd be able to identify later since the "stuff" you'd be summing will be non-negative for all values through which i,ji,j cycles where i,ji,j are the indexes of the double sum you need to form.

Prasun Biswas - 6 years, 1 month ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...