Hello
I was solving the question from the chapter from the book. I squeezed my brain but I'm unable to figure out how to start proving this.
Any help is welcome.
The Problem:
Use the Second Principle of Finite Induction to establish that for all . [Hint: ]
(P.S. I don't need complete proof, I just want to know how to start. If I'm too noob to figure out things after that, I'll ask for complete solution if some would kindly provide :) )
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
After proving the base cases for n=1,2, plug in the expansion of an−1 and an−1−1 (this is valid due to the induction assumption) in the formula given in the hint to get the result for an+1−1.
That seems like a pretty ridiculous hint! If I were going to use induction I'd use an+1−1=(an−1)+an(a−1) and then substitute the expansion in using the inductive hypothesis. Much cleaner.
Log in to reply
Hi Patrick On a different matter can you prove for me that if the sum of two perfect squares is a perfect square then their difference can not be a perfect square Enjoy reading your solutions Des O Carroll
Log in to reply
I'm not sure you're going to like this answer, Des! But here goes. Suppose a2+b2=c2 and a2−b2=d2. This describes a curve in projective 3-space (cut out by the intersection of two planes).
Set y=2b, x=2(a−d), z=2a−c−d for all points on the curve except (1,0,1,1). If (a,b,c,d)=(1,0,1,1), set (x,y,z)=(0,1,0). Then if I did the algebra right, x,y,z satisfy the equation y2z=x(x−z)(x−2z). You may recognize this as an elliptic curve, and in fact this map gives an isomorphism between your original curve and the elliptic curve. Standard elliptic curve methods show that this curve has rank 0 and exactly four torsion points: (0,1,0) plus the three points (a,0,1) where a=0,1,2. These points correspond to the points (1,0,±1,±1) on the original curve. So the only rational solutions to your original equations are the "trivial" ones where b=0.
This is kind of a punt because the "standard elliptic curve methods" are pretty deep. It's not hard to find the torsion subgroup, but showing that the rank is 0 is in general pretty tricky. I actually used a computer algebra system to verify this, but I'm sure there is a down-to-earth way to do it as well for this specific example.
Sorry if I did the algebra wrong! I am sure that the original curve and my elliptic curve are isomorphic (computer algebra system again!), but I haven't checked for sure that my isomorphism is correct.
Log in to reply