From this wiki page multiple integral, the multiple integral is "an integral of a function over a two-dimensional region". But the caption of the image below states that "The double integral of the graphed function corresponds to the volume contained underneath the surface corresponding to the function." and volume is three-dimensional. What is this? Why is it contradicting? Am I missing something?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Well a single integral is the area under the curve so add a dimension to both
Log in to reply
Add a dimension to both what? The x and y axis? Now there are three dimensions - for finding the volume. But the definition says "the multiple integral is an integral of a function over a two-dimensional region" which contradicts this
Log in to reply
Sorry I had meant add a dimension to the function, and add a dimension to the integral
The function was a curve previously, or 1 dimensional but now is 2d wavy sheet taking inputs from x and y and outputting as z
The single integral was the area under a 1 dimensional curve and now becomes the volume under a 2 dimensional wavy sheet
The volume under this is the double integral depending on what limits are taken
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
I am very novice to double integrals, so I have very limited knowledge on them
Log in to reply