Here is the problem in question: https://brilliant.org/practice/storing-data-in-a-computer/?problem=calculus-problem-125641&chapter=introduction-to-memory
Given that the total sequential access speed would be .1s for A and B because they are stored continuously, not fragmented, and the same size total (10MB), why do we factor this into our calculation? Isn't the 7x faster number misleading when the only difference is time cost of overhead * number of files?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There are no comments in this discussion.