In the explanation they use a mathematical rules to find the solution but when I compare it with mine ,the methods was different , my method isn't completely mathematic,but it gives the same result here is what I observe :
Let's start with orange numbers:
while the first number in this set is 3 so by adding 3 in each time we'll gonna a multiple of 3 . And we already know the method that let us know if a number divisible by 3 ,so if we look at 817=136 we have 1+3+6=10 and 10 are not multiple of 3 so 817 isn't orange.
Green numbers:
it started by 2:
2
2+3=5
5+3=8
8+3=11 ----> from this part if you add the numbers of the number that you get you will go back to the first 3 numbers in this set, for example here: 1+1=2 the 1st number in green set.
11+3=14 ------> 1+4=5
14+3=17 ------> 1+7=8
17+3=20 ------> 2+0=2
.
.
.
And 817=136 -----> 1+3+6=10 and 1+0 = 1 and 1 # 2 , 5 ,8 So 136 isn't a green number.
Blue numbers:
it's the same method of the green numbers:
1
1+3=4
4+3=7
7+3=10 ------> 1+0=1
10+3=13 ------> 1+3=4
13+3=16 ------> 1+6=7
16+3=19 ------> 1+9=10 ------> 1+0=1
.
.
.
.
So 817=136 -------> 1+3+6=10 -------> 1+0=1
Which mean that 8*17 is a blue number.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There are no comments in this discussion.