I had been asked by one of my chemistry teachers to find out about an equation. The equation is:
\(3S + 4O_{2} \to SO_{2} + 2SO_{3}\)
How is it possible than an equation can be balanced in two ways even when it is in the simplest form ?
Also this equation cannot be balanced by P.O.A.C. method.
Please anyone help me out and enlighten me on this topic.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Sulphur is going into different oxidation states in sulphur dioxide and sulphur trioxide. So in the first equation one of the sulphur atoms is getting oxidised into sulphur dioxide and the other two into sulphur trioxide. In the second one two sulphur atoms each are going into sulphur dioxide and troxide. Any such reaction could be made with some x sulphur atoms getting oxidised into dioxide and y into trioxide. Now the question is how is this possible that different number of sulphur atoms are getting oxidised in the reactions. The answer is simple. It is because the above reaction is actually a combination of two reactions - one being S+O2→SO2 and the other being 2S+3O2→2SO3. So if the first reaction is added two the second one you would obtain the first reaction given by your teacher. Figure out what happens when you add 2 times the first reaction to the second reaction.
Realize the idea?
Hope this helps.
Log in to reply
Nice explanation.
Log in to reply
Thanks.
yeah.. after doing it gives another balanced equation that too in simplest form. So, this reaction as a whole cannot be possible without breaking it into two different reactions ?
Log in to reply
The reaction is actually a linear combination of two reactions. The question isn't whether the reaction is possible by breaking it into two different reactions.
Log in to reply
Mathematically, this can be explained as follows. Suppose that you can balance the equation as follows.
aS+bO2→cSO2+dSO3
Now, comparing the number of sulfur and oxygen atoms on both sides,
a=c+d and 2b=2c+3d
Now suppose you want a,b,c,d to be integers. It is clear from the second equation that d must be even. Hence d=2D. So (a,b,c,d)=(c+2D,c+3D,c,2D) for any pair of positive integers c and D. In your first reaction you have (c,D)=(1,1) and in the second reaction, you have (c,D)=(2,1). You can find other solutions for other values of c and d.
I don't know if there is a chemical reason behind this.
Log in to reply
Your explanation doesn't make it clear why this actually happens.
Log in to reply
Well, I find Sudeep Salgia's answer to be more insightful, especially because he divides the equation into two separate equations. My answer basically shows you how to convert this into a number theoretic problem.
IMO, You explained it better.
Log in to reply
IMO ?? What it means here ?
Log in to reply