Remainder Theorem: For a polynomial f(x), the remainder of f(x) when dividing by x−c is f(c).
Proof: Dividing f(x) by x−c, we obtain
f(x)=(x−c)q(x)+r(x),
where r(x) is the remainder. Since x−c has degree 1, it follows that the remainder r(x) has degree 0, thus is a constant. Let r(x)=R. Substituting x=c, we obtain f(c)=(c−c)q(c)+R=R. Thus, R=f(c) as claimed. □
Factor Theorem: Let f(x) be a polynomial such that f(c)=0 for some constant c. Then x−c is a factor of f(x). Conversely, if x−c is a factor of f(x), then f(c)=0.
Proof:
(Forward direction) Since f(c)=0, by the Remainder Theorem, we have f(x)=(x−c)h(x)+R=(x−c)h(x). Hence, x−c is a factor of f(x).
(Backward direction) If x−c is a factor of f(x), then (by definition) the remainder when f(x) is divided by x−c would be 0. By the Remainder Theorem, this is equal to f(c). Hence, f(c)=0. □
*Note: *There are no restrictions on the constant c. It could be a real number, a complex number, or even a matrix!
The Remainder-Factor theorem is often used to help factorize polynomials without the use of long division. When combined with the Rational Roots theorem, this gives us a powerful factorization tool.
Technique
Completely factorize f(x)=6x3−23x2−6x+8.
Solution: From the rational root theorem, we try numbers of the form ba, where a divides 8 and b divides 6. By the Remainder-Factor Theorem, we just need to calculate the values for which f(ba)=0. Through trial and error, we obtain
f(1)f(2)f(4)f(21)f(−21)f(−32)=6−23−6+8=−15=48−92−12+8=−48=384−368−24+8=0=43−543−3+8=0=−43−543+3+8=421=−197+1092+4+8=0
This shows x−4,x−21, and x+32 are factors of f(x), implying
f(x)=A(x)(x−4)(x−21)(x+32).
Since the left hand side has degree 3, it follows that A(x) has degree 0, so is a constant we denote by A. Substituting x=0, we obtain A=6. Therefore,
f(x)=6(x−4)(x−21)(x+32)=(x−4)(2x−1)(3x+2).□
Application and Extensions
g(x) is a polynomial that leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by x−1 and leaves a remainder of 4 when divided by x+2. What is the remainder when g(x) is divided by (x−1)(x+2)?
We have g(x)=(x−1)(x+2)q(x)+r(x). Since (x−1)(x+2) has degree 2, the remainder r(x) has degree at most 1, hence r(x)=Ax+B for some constants A and B. By the remainder factor theorem, we have g(1)=1 and g(−2)=4. Substituting x=1 and −2, we obtain
1=g(1)=(1−1)(1+2)q(1)+r(1)=A(1)+B,
4=g(−2)=(−2−1)(−2+2)q(−2)+r(−2)=A(−2)+B.
This implies 1=A+B,4=−2A+B, which has solution A=−1,B=2. Thus, the remainder when g(x) is divided by (x−1)(x+2) is −x+2. □
In an attempt to discover a formula for the Fibonacci numbers, Alex finds a cubic polynomial h(x) such that h(1)=1, h(2)=1, h(3)=2 and h(4)=3. What is the value of h(5)?
Solution: Consider the cubic polynomial j(x)=h(x)−x+1. Then j(1)=1,j(2)=0,j(3)=0 and j(4)=0. By the Remainder-Factor Theorem, we have j(x)=A(x)(x−2)(x−3)(x−4), where A(x) is a polynomial. Since j(x) is a cubic, it follows that A(x) has degree 0, hence is a constant which we denote by A. Substituting x=1, we obtain
1=j(1)=A(1−2)(1−3)(1−4)⇒A=−61.
Thus, h(x)=j(x)+x−1=−61(x−2)(x−3)(x−4)+x−1. Hence,
h(5)=−61(5−2)(5−3)(5−4)+5−1=3.
Note: The closed form of the Fibonacci sequence is an exponential function. This cannot be approximated using a polynomial function for large values of n. □
Suppose k(x) is a polynomial with integer coefficients and c is an integer root of k(x). Show that x−ck(x) is also a polynomial with integer coefficients.
At first glance, it seems impossible to work directly from the Factor Theorem's result that k(c)=0.
Solution: Let the degree of k(x) be n, and let
k(x)=knxn+kn−1xn−1+…+k1x+k0,
where ki are integers. By the remainder-factor theorem,
0=k(c)=kncn+kn−1cn−1+…+k1c+k0.
Using the fact that xi−ci=(x−c)(xi−1+xi−2c+…+xci−2+ci−1), we obtain
k(x)=k(x)−0=k(x)−k(c)=kn(xn−cn)+kn−1(xn−1−cn−1)+…+k1(x−c)+k0(1−1)=(x−c)Q(x).
Since Q(x) is integer combinations of polynomials with integer coefficients, it follows that Q(x) is also a polynomial with integer coefficients. □
#Algebra
#Polynomials
#Remainder-FactorTheorem
#KeyTechniques
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
what is number system
PPP php cporpp