Suppose that row operations and column operations are restricted in a way that
Row Operations:
(R1) Add an integral multiple of a row to another.
(R2) Exchange two rows.
(R3) Multiply a row by -1 .
Column Operations:
(C1) Add an integral multiple of a column to another.
(C2) Exchange two columns.
(C3) Multiply a column by -1 .
With such rules, is there a mean for us to diagonalise
say , that is of integral elements, to , that is also of integral elements only, without resorting to Gaussian Elimination?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
What's the difference between your set of rules, and the rules of Gaussian elimination?
That will provide some insight into which steps of Gaussian are invalid, and then we can hope to fix them. If it turns out that we cannot fix them, that might provide an idea of finding a counter example. If we can fix all the steps, then the answer would be yes :)
The rules of the restricted row operation can be thought as be the subset of the rules of normal row operations,
in rules of normal row operations, say in (R1), we can multiply an multiple of a real number and one of the row to another row.
Besides, the restricted operations are rules on the manipulation on diophantine equation, based on the fact that {a1x+a2y+a3z=n1b1x+b2y+b3z=n2⇔{k1(a1x+a2y+a3z)+k2(b1x+b2y+b3z)=k1n1+k2n2−1(b1x+b2y+b3z)=−n2
Log in to reply
Great! So you identified that "We changed the condition from real multiples to integer multiples". We know that for real multiples, this can always be done. We want to know what happens for integer multiples.
So, that's a great place to start. Think of a system which requires you to use real, but not integer, multiples. Does that provide a counter example?
If yes, why? How can we explain that this is impossible?
If no, why not? How did we circumvent it?