This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Lets take 4 digit abcd.
So k∣1000d+100c+10b+a & k∣1000a+100b+10c+d
⟹k∣999d+90c−90b−999a
⟹k∣9.
Again
k∣1000d+100c+10b+a+1000a+100b+10c+d
⟹k∣1001d+110c+110b+1001a
⟹k∣11
Combining
k∣99.
YOU CAN PROVE IT USING INDUCTION.
Log in to reply
Not quite. Be careful of your implication signs. For example, if k∣999, must we have k∣1?
Log in to reply
Oops no.. yes.. thats true... ok.. thanks sir
can anyone please help me out with this problem
Log in to reply
What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
Its easy I guess.. will post a soln. I didnt did it with pen and paper. Idk if I am correct becoz i did it in my mind
Log in to reply
not correct
Log in to reply
Hint: Try to use the fact that even when the number is reflected it's sum of the digits still remain the same.