If a,b,c∈R+ , such that abc=1 , then prove that cyc∑ba≥cyc∑a
Instruction: Those who have complete solution ready , please don't post it immediately.Post it minimum after 3 days of posting this note or give a small hint but not the solution.
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Multiplying by abc and making the right side homogenous, it suffices to prove: a2c+b2a+c2b≥(abc)32(a+b+c)=a35b32c32+a32b35c32+a32b32c35
By AM-GM you know:
a2c+a2c+ab2≥3a35b32c32b2a+b2a+bc2≥3a32b35c32c2b+c2b+ca2≥3a32b32c35
Add them and you are done.
Dividing the new equation you will get the inequality mentioned in the question or reverse. But reverse is not acceptable because any great variation in a,b,c will not satisfy it. Sorry Nihar for posting the full solution.
I don't think you can divide the inequalities. For example (exaggerated),
2≥1200000000000000≥1
Dividing the first inequality by the second yields an incorrect inequality :\ Check out my solution.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Multiplying by abc and making the right side homogenous, it suffices to prove: a2c+b2a+c2b≥(abc)32(a+b+c)=a35b32c32+a32b35c32+a32b32c35 By AM-GM you know: a2c+a2c+ab2≥3a35b32c32 b2a+b2a+bc2≥3a32b35c32 c2b+c2b+ca2≥3a32b32c35 Add them and you are done.
Log in to reply
How and why did you develop such approach....It's not obvious at all.....Plz. provide some better suggestions...
i think we can make subsitutions... a = x/y, b = y/z and c = z/x
Log in to reply
I recommend you to solve it completely and then post it.If you have some thoughts/ideas , you can post them after a complete solution is posted.
Also , if in your method , you are stuck some where , you are welcome to show your working.
I don't think such a substitution is not allowed. Take the example of 1/2 , 3/4 , 8/3. This is not an example like a=x/y,b=y/z,c=z/x.
Can I post my solutions now? I used MG-MA (reversed).
Log in to reply
Post it after one or two days.
You can post it now :)
what about the inequality posted by me ? it's hard try to solve it.
Log in to reply
I tried it but I didn't get it. I think its too tough for RMO level. You can post a solution there (if you have).
Apply AM GM(twice)
Does cyc∑ba mean ba+cb+ac or ba+cb+ac+ab+bc+ca ??
Log in to reply
The first one is only cyclic . The second is symmetric.
This can be proved using AM-GM only
ba+cb+ac≥3ba×cb×acba+cb+ac≥3a+b+c≥3abca+b+c≥3
Dividing the new equation you will get the inequality mentioned in the question or reverse. But reverse is not acceptable because any great variation in a,b,c will not satisfy it. Sorry Nihar for posting the full solution.
Log in to reply
I don't think you can divide the inequalities. For example (exaggerated), 2≥1 200000000000000≥1 Dividing the first inequality by the second yields an incorrect inequality :\ Check out my solution.