Is it possible to make the physics problems stick to analytical/universal solutions (with letters and integers as much as possible) instead of nasty numerical values? Presently, a person like me without even the most basic type of calculator (on principle) spends much more time conjuring ingenius numerical approximations than focusing on the conceptual/physics part of the problem, and still too often get penalized for missing a significant digit! Granted, unit conversion and numerical computation are very much an integral part of physics -- but not necessarily of brilliance?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I agree.
As a physics lover,i do agree to it.I think it's important too.
agreed wid u..... :)