This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Let ABCD be a rhombus such that A: (-a,0), B; (0,b), C: (a,0) & D: (0,-b) with centre of the rhombus as (0,0).
Now draw a line: y=mx+c passing through D and intersecting extended BA & BC in P & Q respectively.
We now have a triangle PQB with a rhombus whose vertices are on the triangle sides.
Since y=mx+c passes through D, c = -b. We can now determine P as intersection of y=mx -b & x/a+y/b=1 and thus, P:[2ab/(am-b), b(am+b)/(am-b)]. Similarly, Q:[2ab/(am+b), b(am-b)/(am+b)]. Further, we determine the area of triangle PQB taking the vertices in anti-clockwise direction.
Tr. PQB = (1/2){(2ab/(am-b))[b(am-b)/(am+b) -b)+(2ab/(am+b))[b -b(am-b)/(am-b)]}
This simplifies to, Tr. PQB = 4ab³/(b²-a²m² ) whereas atra pf Rhombus ABCD = 2ab.
Note that if m=0 then (1/2) Tr.PQB = 2ab = Area of Rhombus ABCD.
Otherwise (1/2)*4ab³/(b²-a²m² ) > 2ab if b²>b² - a²m² or if a²m²>0 which is always true.
Hence the proposition stands proven.
Let K= area of ABC,[]= the area of a polygon, b=AC, and c=AB. Note that, since AXYZ is a rhombus, AY is an angle bisector of ∠A. From the angle bisector theorem, we get YCBY=bc. From this, we get BCBY=b+cc and BCYC=b+cb.
Now, [AXYZ]=K−[ZYC]−[XYB]=K−K(b+cb)2−K(b+cc)2=K((b+c)22bc). Finally, we are left to prove that (b+c)22bc≤21. Rearranging this gives us (b−c)2≥0, which is clearly always true. Thus, [AXYZ]≤21K, and our proof is complete.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Let ABCD be a rhombus such that A: (-a,0), B; (0,b), C: (a,0) & D: (0,-b) with centre of the rhombus as (0,0). Now draw a line: y=mx+c passing through D and intersecting extended BA & BC in P & Q respectively. We now have a triangle PQB with a rhombus whose vertices are on the triangle sides. Since y=mx+c passes through D, c = -b. We can now determine P as intersection of y=mx -b & x/a+y/b=1 and thus, P:[2ab/(am-b), b(am+b)/(am-b)]. Similarly, Q:[2ab/(am+b), b(am-b)/(am+b)]. Further, we determine the area of triangle PQB taking the vertices in anti-clockwise direction. Tr. PQB = (1/2){(2ab/(am-b))[b(am-b)/(am+b) -b)+(2ab/(am+b))[b -b(am-b)/(am-b)]} This simplifies to, Tr. PQB = 4ab³/(b²-a²m² ) whereas atra pf Rhombus ABCD = 2ab. Note that if m=0 then (1/2) Tr.PQB = 2ab = Area of Rhombus ABCD.
Otherwise (1/2)*4ab³/(b²-a²m² ) > 2ab if b²>b² - a²m² or if a²m²>0 which is always true.
Hence the proposition stands proven.
Log in to reply
Really thanks for the proof.But is there any prove without using coordinate geometry?
Here's an algebraic proof:
Let K= area of ABC,[]= the area of a polygon, b=AC, and c=AB. Note that, since AXYZ is a rhombus, AY is an angle bisector of ∠A. From the angle bisector theorem, we get YCBY=bc. From this, we get BCBY=b+cc and BCYC=b+cb.
K[ZYC]=(b+cb)2⇒[ZYC]=K(b+cb)2 K[XYB]=(b+cc)2⇒[XYB]=K(b+cc)2.
Now, [AXYZ]=K−[ZYC]−[XYB]=K−K(b+cb)2−K(b+cc)2=K((b+c)22bc). Finally, we are left to prove that (b+c)22bc≤21. Rearranging this gives us (b−c)2≥0, which is clearly always true. Thus, [AXYZ]≤21K, and our proof is complete.
Log in to reply
Thanks .But I think AY is bisector because AXYZ is rhombus,a diagonal is not a bisector in parallelogram.
Log in to reply
Oops, sorry about that! I've fixed my solution.