[Feature Request] Separating mechanics from electricity, magnetism
i strongly believe that there r many students who want mechanics separated from electricity.
maybe, Brilliant can make a separate column for magnetism and electrodynamics
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
As of now we are not generating enough physics problems to merit making them two seperate categories. Out of curiosity, is it because people are stronger in mechanics than E&M and vice versa? Would you like two different columns, because it would better allow you to get problems in your level for each discipline? Fill us in.
I personally don't think that they need to be separated, but I think I understand why some people might want that. One reason could be that at least in the education system here in Sweden, mechanics is (unfortunately) covered much more thorough than electricity and magnetism (I myself had to read up on electric flux to be able to do this week's problem), and I think that might be one reason. If you know more about one or the other, you have a better chance to do well in that category. But on the other hand, there is nothing bad in having to learn more physics to be able to do the problems. So personally, I don't think they should be separated, but I think I understand why some people might.
I agree with you. I'm italian and I'm 18 (this is my last high school's year) but I've not studied magnetism yet (it's part of the last months of school). I think you should separate categories in order to get more young people in doing some of those problems, otherwise they don't even try!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
As of now we are not generating enough physics problems to merit making them two seperate categories. Out of curiosity, is it because people are stronger in mechanics than E&M and vice versa? Would you like two different columns, because it would better allow you to get problems in your level for each discipline? Fill us in.
Log in to reply
yes, i think seperating them the two will be for everyone's good
Chemistry!
I'd rather have chemistry instead of 2 separate physics
Agree with Suhas C. :)
I personally don't think that they need to be separated, but I think I understand why some people might want that. One reason could be that at least in the education system here in Sweden, mechanics is (unfortunately) covered much more thorough than electricity and magnetism (I myself had to read up on electric flux to be able to do this week's problem), and I think that might be one reason. If you know more about one or the other, you have a better chance to do well in that category. But on the other hand, there is nothing bad in having to learn more physics to be able to do the problems. So personally, I don't think they should be separated, but I think I understand why some people might.
Log in to reply
I agree with you. I'm italian and I'm 18 (this is my last high school's year) but I've not studied magnetism yet (it's part of the last months of school). I think you should separate categories in order to get more young people in doing some of those problems, otherwise they don't even try!
I agree with all of the above In most countries mechanics is emphasized far more heavily than Electricity and Magnetism in 1st year physics courses