Definition: A set X is closed under addition if, for p and q both in X (with p and q not necessarily distinct!), p+q is always in X.
Easy question: Is there a non-empty subset of the irrationals that is closed under addition?
Tricky question? Is there an uncountably infinite non-empty subset of the irrationals that is closed under addition?
For example, the set {sqrt(2)} fails because it is not closed; taking p=sqrt(2), q=sqrt(2), we find that p+q=2*sqrt(2) is not in the set. The set of reals fails because it is not a subset of the irrationals.
I came up with this problem today, solved it, and I hope it makes you think. :)
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
The set of reals R is uncountably infinitely-dimensional as a vector space over Q. Let X be a Hamel basis for R which contains 1, and let Y=X\{1} be everything in the Hamel basis except 1. Certainly Y is uncountable.
Let Z be the set of finite sums of elements of Y, so that Z is the set of real numbers of the form z=n1y1+n2y2+⋯+nmym where m∈N and n1,n2,…,nm∈N, while y1,y2,…,ym∈Y. It is clear that:
Z is uncountable, since it has Y as a subset,
Z is closed under addition,
No element of Z is rational. If Z∩Q=∅, we could find m,n1,n2,…,nm∈N and distinct y1,y2,…,ym∈Y and q∈Q such that n1y1+n2y2+⋯+nmym−q×1=0 But this tells us that there is a nontrivial rational linear dependence relation between the elements y1,y2,…,ym,1 of X, which is not possible.
Thus Z does the job. I would not want to attempt to write down a concrete example of a set Z!
Log in to reply
Nice! ^__^ And much better explained that I ever would have. :P
The set with elements multiples of root 2 (only positive multiples)
Log in to reply
Yes, this satisfies the first one. :D It obviously does not satisfy the second one, though; I suggest trying that one too. :)
Log in to reply
2nd 1 is really difficult...
I tried the 2nd one bt i could not, plz tell me the answer...