Set Theory Proof of mn<2mnm^n < 2^{mn} for m,nZ+m,n \in Z^{+}

nm<2mnn^m<2^{mn} for m,nZ+m,n \in Z^{+}

I chanced upon a rather interesting proof of this while studying sets, relations and functions in math class. Try to see if you can find it!

To get you started, consider two non-empty sets AA and BB containing mm and nn elements respectively. I'll post the solution in a few days...

SOLUTION

  1. Consider two non-empty sets AA and BB containing mm and nn elements respectively.

  2. The CARTESIAN PRODUCT of AA and BB, given by A×B={(a,b):aA,bB}A \times B = \{(a,b):a \in A, b \in B\}, is the set that contains all possible ordered pairs of the form (a,b)(a,b). Obviously, this set contains mnmn elements.

  3. A RELATION between two sets AA and BB is defined as a subset of their Cartesian product. Then, how many relations are possible between AA and BB? This is the number of possible subsets of the Cartesian product, or, in other words, the number of elements in the POWER SET of A×BA \times B. How do we find the number of possible subsets of A×BA \times B? To choose a subset from a set, what do we do? We either choose an element to be part of the subset or not, i.e. we make a choice between 2 alternatives. Since there are mnmn elements in the set, and we need to make a choice for each element, the number of subsets possible is given by 2mn\boxed{2^{mn}}.

  4. A FUNCTION between two sets AA and BB is a subset of their Cartesian product too (just like a relation) but with an additional constraint: all elements of AA should have exactly one image in BB. Then, how many functions are possible between AA and BB? Since each element in AA has nn possible choices of an image in BB and there are mm elements in AA, there are a total of nm\boxed{n^{m}} possible functions from AA to BB.

  5. The final step is just logic: if a function is a relation with a constraint, there have to be fewer possible functions than relations.

Hence, nm<2mnn^m < 2^{mn}.

#Functions #Subset #Relations #SetTheory #CartesianProduct

Note by Raj Magesh
6 years, 11 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

mn?2mnmn?(2m)nm<2mmn<2mn { m }^{ n }\quad ?{ \quad 2 }^{ mn }\\ { m }^{ n }\quad ?\quad { ({ 2 }^{ m }) }^{ n }\\ m\quad <\quad { 2 }^{ m }\\ { m }^{ n }\quad <{ \quad 2 }^{ mn }

*I use the ? to show that the relation is not yet known

Niven Achenjang - 6 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, of course you're right algebraically, but that's not the curious proof I saw. I'll post the solution soon, maybe in two more days... :)

Raj Magesh - 6 years, 11 months ago

Subbed for any good solutions other than simple inequality. =3=

Samuraiwarm Tsunayoshi - 6 years, 11 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...