Should this be a conditional probability?

So i was working my way through the "Probability Applications" course when the last problem of the last quiz raised a question. How do i discern between conditional probability and probability of intersection, $P(A\mid B)$ and $P(A\cap B)$ ? When i first read the problem i thought that i needed to calculate the probability of the following events:

probability of a process being in control given investigation was triggered
probability of a process not being in control given investigation was not triggered.

I managed to work out a solution with this in mind and it was rather plausible. But when i checked the author's solution there were calculations of the probability of the following events:

probability of a process being in control and investigation was triggered
probability of a process not being in control and investigation was not triggered.

But why? This just bothers me and it seems that i'm missing something important here.

#Combinatorics

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

Markdown	Appears as
`italics` or `_italics_`	italics
`bold` or `__bold__`	bold
- bulleted - list	bulleted list
1. numbered 2. list	numbered list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1 paragraph 2	paragraph 1 paragraph 2
`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`	example link
`> This is a quote`	This is a quote
# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"	# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"

Math	Appears as
Remember to wrap math in `$` ... `$` or `\[` ... `\]` to ensure proper formatting.
`2 \times 3`	$2 \times 3$
`2^{34}`	$2^{34}$
`a_{i-1}`	$a_{i-1}$
`\frac{2}{3}`	$\frac{2}{3}$
`\sqrt{2}`	$\sqrt{2}$
`\sum_{i=1}^3`	$\sum_{i=1}^3$
`\sin \theta`	$\sin \theta$
`\boxed{123}`	$\boxed{123}$

Comments

We need to find the expected value of the savings the control chart. There are four cases, and we need to weight the payoff of each of these by their probabilities. Remember from the end of the problem: there's a 5% chance that a process is out of control.

Control and triggered: There is a 5% of an out of control process. Given that, there is a 99% chance of triggering. So, there is a 5% * 99% = 4.95% chance of control and triggered.

We can repeat this for the other scenarios and go from there.

In short, you need to use the fact that $P(A \cap B) = P(B) \cdot P(A|B)$ here, combining the information about a 5% chance of a process being out of control, and then using the conditional probabilities to find the total joint probabilities.

Eli Ross Staff - 3 years, 3 months ago

Math	Appears as
Remember to wrap math in `\(` ... `\)` or `\[` ... `\]` to ensure proper formatting.
`2 \times 3`	$2 \times 3$
`2^{34}`	$2^{34}$
`a_{i-1}`	$a_{i-1}$
`\frac{2}{3}`	$\frac{2}{3}$
`\sqrt{2}`	$\sqrt{2}$
`\sum_{i=1}^3`	$\sum_{i=1}^3$
`\sin \theta`	$\sin \theta$
`\boxed{123}`	$\boxed{123}$