There are three types of people in this world:
Evaluate:
S=1−1+1−1+1−1+…
Type 1
S=(1−1)+(1−1)+(1−1)+…=0+0+0+…=0
Type 2
S=1−(1−1)−(1−1)−(1−1)−…=1−0−0−0−…=1
But the 3rd type of people did like this:
1−S=1−(1−1+1−1+…)=1−1+1−1+1−1+…=S
⇔1−S=S⇒2S=1⇒S=21
#Algebra
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
You forgot 4th type of people; they say that this series diverges.
Log in to reply
Its answer oscillates b/w 0 and 1
Log in to reply
Yes that's why it diverges.
Even more here:
Evaluate : S=1−2+3−4+5−6+…
Type 1 : S=1+(−2+3)+(−4+5)+…=1+1+1+1+…=∞
Type 2 : S=(1−2)+(3−4)+(5−6)+…=−1−1−1−1+…=−∞
Type 3 : They go to WolframAlpha, search this:
Which shows up that "The ratio test is inconclusive." and "The root test is inconclusive.", from which they implies that the sum is incosistent.
Type 4 : They go to Wikipedia and finds out that the sum is actually equal to 1/4.
Log in to reply
Wow! Awesome!
I also saw this video:
1+2+3+4+…=121
Log in to reply
Wow, that's cool :)))
i guess u forgot the negative sign along with 1/12
last one is pretty good
haha.. g8
Grandi series.
Gud 1