All of us have solved many problems on cubic polynomials who have their roots in Arithmetic Progression and Geometric Progression.So I have found a relationship between the coefficients of these polynomials which makes these roots special.
So first , let's start with the roots in Arithmetic Progression.
Consider a polynomial : α1x3+α2x2+α3x+α4.
Let its roots be β,γ,λ such that they form an arithmetic progression.So we have a relation :
⇒2γ=β+λ…(1)
Now our favorite polynomial tool cum friend that is , Vieta's formula will help us to have some more relations:
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
While the (tedious) algebra work has (hopefully) no mistakes, it ends up obscuring the "true beauty" of the equation. Having found the nice relation, you should think about alternative / better ways of proving the result. Often, the first solution (esp a brute force one) is not the best approach. There will be parts that can be discarded, or rewritten.
For example, let's take the Geometric progression case. Here is a nice simple solution:
By dividing throughout by a3, we may assume that the roots are 1,r,r2, which means that the polynomial is A(x−1)(x−r)(x−r2)=A[x3−(1+r+r2)x2+(r+r2+r3)x−r3]. Hence, we can immediately conclude that α1α4=(α2α3)3.
Now, I have still hidden the beauty of the solution. If you truly understand it, the following problem has a "one line" solution.
For a polynomial whose n roots are in geometric progression, what is the relationship between α1αn+1 and α2αn?
How about α2+iαn−i?
My thought: Its a good idea to assume the roots as 1,r,r2.But one can argue that we get the relationship α1α4=(α2α3)3 only if one of the roots is 1.What about when it is not equal to 1? There is no guarantee that the relationship remains the same for all possible roots.
For a polynomial whose n roots are in geometric progression, I think α1αn+1=(α2αn)n. Am I right?
Also I didn't understand what do you want me to find about α2+iαn−i.
@Nihar Mahajan
–
Right, as I said, some steps/explanation is still missing. One of the steps is explaining what "Dividing throughout by a3" means. What this is, is that if the polynomial h(x) has roots a,ar,ar2, then the polynomial h(ax) will have roots of 1,r,r2. Thus, we can apply the above to conclude about the coefficients of h(ax), from which that gives us information about h(x). It is not immediately apparent that they have to satisfy the same equation, so we have to verify why h(x) still works.
Of course, another approach would be to check that
from which the identity follows. However, this is still "tedious magical algebra", instead of getting to the "actual reason why this relationship should exist" which would allow us to easily generalize to an−i/a2+i.
No, you're abusing the math notations. You can't have "x" is a root the equation (with variable "x" again). That makes no sense.
You're on the right track, yes, if you let "p-q, p, p + q" be the 3 roots that follow an AP, then yes, you can prove all the results that Nihar has shown with less work.
@Ankit Kumar Jain
–
No worries! The next step from here is probably figure out how to identify whether a cubic equation has real and/or non-real roots.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I assume you're only solving for cubic polynomials.
Now try for Harmonic progression as well! And post some challenges!
Nice read! Great work!
Next stop: Apply Newton's sum! 。◕‿◕。
Log in to reply
Hey, I observed that even ⌈ππlnπ⌉ is the meaning of life.
Thanks a lot. I will for sure try it for Harmonic progression. And yeah , I will not make Newton's sums feel lonely. ⌣¨.
This is really cool. Good work, keep it up! :)
Log in to reply
Thanks a lot :)
@Calvin Lin I will be happy if you read this. :)
Log in to reply
While the (tedious) algebra work has (hopefully) no mistakes, it ends up obscuring the "true beauty" of the equation. Having found the nice relation, you should think about alternative / better ways of proving the result. Often, the first solution (esp a brute force one) is not the best approach. There will be parts that can be discarded, or rewritten.
For example, let's take the Geometric progression case. Here is a nice simple solution:
Now, I have still hidden the beauty of the solution. If you truly understand it, the following problem has a "one line" solution.
Log in to reply
My thought: Its a good idea to assume the roots as 1,r,r2.But one can argue that we get the relationship α1α4=(α2α3)3 only if one of the roots is 1.What about when it is not equal to 1? There is no guarantee that the relationship remains the same for all possible roots.
For a polynomial whose n roots are in geometric progression, I think α1αn+1=(α2αn)n. Am I right?
Also I didn't understand what do you want me to find about α2+iαn−i.
Log in to reply
a3" means. What this is, is that if the polynomial h(x) has roots a,ar,ar2, then the polynomial h(ax) will have roots of 1,r,r2. Thus, we can apply the above to conclude about the coefficients of h(ax), from which that gives us information about h(x). It is not immediately apparent that they have to satisfy the same equation, so we have to verify why h(x) still works.
Right, as I said, some steps/explanation is still missing. One of the steps is explaining what "Dividing throughout byOf course, another approach would be to check that
(x−a)(x−ar)(x−ar2)=x3−(a+ar+ar2)x2+(a2r+a2r2+a2r3)−ar3.
from which the identity follows. However, this is still "tedious magical algebra", instead of getting to the "actual reason why this relationship should exist" which would allow us to easily generalize to an−i/a2+i.
Gud... Thanks...
Log in to reply
Welcome buddy!
Excellent work!
gud work nihar
@Nihar Mahajan @Pi Han Goh What about this?
Let the roots be x−y,x,x+y , by Vieta's relations we have
3x=a1−a2
But since x is a root of the equation , therefore substitute this value of x in the equation and simplify by to get the desired result.
Log in to reply
No, you're abusing the math notations. You can't have "x" is a root the equation (with variable "x" again). That makes no sense.
You're on the right track, yes, if you let "p-q, p, p + q" be the 3 roots that follow an AP, then yes, you can prove all the results that Nihar has shown with less work.
Log in to reply
Oops...I should have used the same variable..Sorry!!
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Here are some relevant articles: Cardano's method and Cubic discriminant.
Log in to reply
Thanks a lot sir.!
And even the GP case can be done easily with a similar analysis.