On this note, I said about some patterns, even though the Faulhaber's formula makes this somewhat useless, I found some patters, first of all, as someone commented:
∑i=1nia≈a+1na+1
I will prove the following statement:
"The highest order term of the polynomial that represents ∑i=1nia is a+1na+1"
I will use a strong induction to prove this, starting with the base case of a=0, we have:
i=1∑nia=n So the highest term is n=a+1na+1
We will assume that this will work for a=0,1,2,…,k, then for a=k+1, we have:
j=1∑njk+1=k+2∑i=1k+2(ik+2)ni−∑i=0k((ik+2)∑j=1nji)
The highest term of this will be k+2nk+2, that is obtained when, on the first sum, the i=k+2, so (ik+2)ni=(k+2k+2)nk+2=nk+2, no other term has this order on the numerator, because the highest one on the other sum is k+1nk+1, whose order is not the same, the term becomes k+2nk+2 when I consider the denominator;
The other pattern I saw is that the second term of the sum is 2na
I will have to use the Faulhaber's formula:
∑i=1nia=a+11∑i=0a(ia+1)Bi+na+1−i
The term of a degree appears when i=1 on the right sum, so it is:
a+11(1a+1)B1+na=B1+na
Since B1+=21 (I am using this definition), the term is:
21na=2na
#Algebra
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
These are great thoughts! Mathematicians look for patterns in the data, and then try to prove that the pattern exists, as you have done above.