Good Evening
In the Special relativity course on the chapter about spacetime intervals, there is a form of the equation for the spacetime interval that looks like this: (Δt^2) > (Δx/c)^2 where the time interval that separates two causally related events A and B (A caused B) is greater than the time that light would need to propagate to reach event B from A, but if that's the case then doesn't that mean that the light bolt would "miss" event B since it will pass B's location before B happened?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
@Brilliant Mathematics
Log in to reply
@Quantum pixel You are interpreting this condition correctly. A light beam traveling from event A arrives at (and passes) the place where event B will happen before event B actually happens.
If Δx is the distance between two events A and B, then Δx/c is how long it takes a beam of light to travel from the position of one event to the position of the other because light travels with speed c.
The time Δt between events A and B has no relationship to Δx in general, but if event B follows from event A, then the time between the events is constrained. For example, event A might be someone picking up and glass, and event B is the glass breaking because the same person dropped it. In this case, (Δt)2≥(Δx/c)2. This condition prevents such paradoxes as an observer (moving relative to the person in event A) who sees the glass break before it was picked up.
In the future, if you have concerns about a problem's wording/clarity/etc., you can report the problem. See how here.