What is wrong with this proof or is it in fact it is valid?
Does that mean that all 8 solutions are solutions of ?
I know that can be expressed as but my questions are:
1) Which of the 8 solutions are invalid and why are they invalid?
2) Is it possible of to have more than 2 solutions? If so, what are they?
3) Is it possible for to have any solutions where there is a real part (in addition to the 2 given)?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Finding the square roots of i is the same thing as solving the equation x2=i in complex numbers.
Now, what you did is raise both sides of this equation to the fourth power to get x8=1. While it is true that if x2=i, then x8=1, but the converse is not always true. In other words, when you are raising the equation to a power, you're introducing extraneous solutions.
Take this for example. If x=4, then x2=16. But x2=16 implies x is equal to either 4 or −4. So squaring gave you something (x=−4) that's not a solution to the orginal equation.
The fundamental theorem of algebra ensures that an n-degree polynomial with complex coefficients can have at most n complex roots. So that means a complex number can not have more than two complex square roots. But higher dimensional numbers (like quaternions) are a different story.
Log in to reply
Ok thanks for clearing that up. I'll look into some quaternions...
As x=4 and x2=16 aren't same, x2=i and i aren't same too.
Solving x2=i, we get x=e4iπ=4−1,e−43iπ.
But i means principal root of i which is 4−1
Log in to reply
It is possible to extend the definition of a principle square root to an arbitrary complex number, but it's usually not done because it is not as useful as the principal square root of a non-negative real. (The definition you're using is something like this: the principal square root is the one with the positive real part or the one that lies in the right-complex-half-plane, or z=∣z∣∣z+∣z∣∣z+∣z∣) That's why the principal square root operator, is generally not used on a general complex number. It doesn't offer us much to talk about a particular square root of a general complex number.
The OP was actually looking for the square roots (plural) of ei2π [even though they didn't state it explicitly] and I was aiming to address that.
Log in to reply
It can be use in hard forms