Problem: https://brilliant.org/practice/probability-is-everywhere/?p=2
I understand the desire to assume that because a car is there before you that you will have to wait less time, but without knowing if the light is controlled by time or by sensors, it seems wrong to assume that the car makes any difference.
The solution states that because the car is there you can assume that you are later than normal, but that seems flawed. What if that driver only drives on that road every other day? Or what if a road elsewhere is under construction and that driver had to take this route instead?
Is there something I'm missing here?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There are no comments in this discussion.