We know that the summation sequence 1/1+1/2+1/3+1/4… goes to ∞
And the summation sequence 1/1+1/4+1/9+1/16 … = π^2/6
So there is some x beyond which 1^(-x) + 2^(-x) + 3^(-x) … sums to a finite number and beneath which the sum tends to ∞
Does anyone have an idea on what x is, and if possible a proof
Note: According to the Riemann zeta function 1^(-1) + 2^(-1) … goes to -1/12, so my question in that context would be when would the Riemann zeta function give the output as ∞/-∞ , not sure but I think both of these questions are the same ( if not please tell )
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
x>1 gives a convergent sum. x⩽1 gives a divergent sum.
Look up Convergence test for p-series.
Log in to reply
I looked it up right now and it says it’s at 1?!
Log in to reply
What is at 1?
What was said exactly was that it converges for p>1
Log in to reply
Oh whoops, lemme fix my comment. I accidentally wrote "2".
My hypothesis for the Riemann zeta function part was because I thought the function was continuous
Log in to reply
Never would have thought that it abruptly jumped from -1/12 to a positive value at 1
Log in to reply
What I expected was for it to go towards - ∞ as x>p>1 then at x jump to ∞ and for p>x sum up to smaller and smaller positive values ( that’s what my intuition said to me )
1/1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + ... = -1/12
is only true when we want to regularize divergent sums.
i gave some hints in my latex note, but i can repeat it here ;-)
you are right: i'm used to treat hexadecimals as numbers.
(so i refer to a, b, c, d, e, f as numbers too)
with this you can decode every two "numbers" to represent a char.
so "beating a dead horse" = 79767a67 726d7420 7a207776 7a772073 6c696876
decrypts by: 79='b', 76='e', 7a='a', ...
if you continue that you will figure what 20 means
Log in to reply
Wow it’s a space
Log in to reply
Wait heh
Oh no wonder I kept missing the middle word 7a207776 quite deceptive to keep a space for no use and deceptively keep the space named differently
Lol nice code
Log in to reply
Intentional, gosh the 7 and 6’s and that 20 kept throwing me off track
you are fast. yeah, you got it.