is called a superperfect number when .I saw every superperfect numbers is in the form when is a Mersenne prime.I can prove that numbers in this form will be superperfect but cannot prove the converse that all superperfect numbers are in this form. can anybody help me to prove? If this is not true then also tell me I am not sure about it.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
You mean you saw it on wiki? 'Cause its there...
This might be helpful...check out perfect Numbers, as explained by Numberphile: (http://m.youtube.com/watch? v=q8n15q1v4Xo)
Log in to reply
Thank you very much it became really useful to me .Though here they only proved the form of perfect number but listening to the class I got idea to the form of superperfect number.Identified the series of super perfect number
Can you please provide a proof that if 2k+1−1 is a Mersenne prime then 2k is a perfect number because that might help us when we try to prove the converse.
Log in to reply
Here let n=2k
σ(σ(2k)
=σ(2−12k+1−1)
=σ(2k+1−1)
As 2k+1−1 is a prime σ(2k+1−1)=(2k+1−1)+1=2k+1=2.2k=2n
Proved that it is always a superperfect number.
Certainly I will post it .just wait
I read it on Elementary Number Theory by David Burton,then opened wiki and saw but there is no proof there neither direct one nor converse