Suppose that \(z_1, z_2, z_3, z_4, z_5 \) are complex numbers which satisfy
What can we conclude about ?
You may refer to System Of Complex Equations, in which Mursalin and Prakhar showed that if only the first 2 conditions are true, then we can't really conclude too much. Other than a regular pentagon, the 5 points could be that of an equilateral triangle along with a diameter, or even 5 'somewhat random' points on the circle (no easy description).
How does adding in the third condition help us?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Rearranging the third equation z2(z1+z3)=−z5(z4+z1) and taking modulus on both the sides, one obtains: ∣z1+z3∣=∣z1+z4∣. This means that the distance of z1 from z3 and z4 is same. Join the centre with z1. Call this line OA. Now, OA divides the circle into two semicircles. z3 and z4 obviously cannot lie on the same semicircle. They lie symmetrically about OA on different semicircles. Further divide the semicircle in four quadrants. Here is an image to go with my explanation:
Notice that z3 and z4 cannot lie in 1st and 4th quadrant. If they did, z3+z4 would be along z1 and ∣z1∣+∣z3+z4∣>1 but since ∣z2+z5∣<1, it would be impossible to satisfy the second condition. So, z3 and z4 must lie in 3rd and 2nd quadrants.
By a similar argument, z2 and z5 must lie in 3rd and 2nd quadrant. They too must lie symmetrically about OA and on different sections of semicircles.
Hence, it is a pentagon but not necessarily a regular one.
I am not sure if this is correct, though.
Log in to reply
This is a great piece of analysis!
I just realized that I screwed up the 3rd equation, and missed out the z3z4 term. Let me post a new note to reflect that.
Log in to reply
Ah!
Thanks Calvin! :)
They may be 5 th roots of unity
They may be vertices of regular Pentagon inscribed the in a unit circle