k=4∑n{ f(k−2)−f(k) }
= k=4∑nf(k−2)−k=4∑nf(k)
= k=2∑n−2f(k)−k=4∑nf(k)
= f(2)+f(3)+k=4∑n−2f(k)−k=4∑n−2f(k)−f(n−1)−f(n)
= f(2)+f(3)+...............0.............................−f(n−1)−f(n)
NOTE:−Change of boundareys k=m∑nf(k)=k=m+p∑n+pf(k−p)…p is any intiger.
k=m∑nf(k)=k=m∑rf(k)+k=r+1∑nf(k)−>splitting the range into m to r and (r+1) to n.
We change the first summation from 4 through n to 2 through n-2 so that the expression inside becomes X^k for both summation.
Then separate out summations between k=4 and k=n-2 which cancels out to 0.
We are left with remaining first TWO terms from the first summation and last TWO
from the second, since there is a difference of 2 (p=2) in the start of the two summations.
For other p values this should be adjusted suitably
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Um... Consider using latex. All this "^" stuff makes it really confusing.
Cheers
Log in to reply
Thanks. I have now used \displaystyle \color\red{Latex}