That seems unlikely... Prove it!

Show that there exists a positive integer nn such that the decimal representations of 3n3^n and 7n7^n both start with the digits 10.

#NumberTheory #Finn #Digits #CanYouProveIt?

Note by Finn Hulse
7 years, 1 month ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Very very nice problem :D

Hint: Rewrite the numbers as (52)n(5-2)^n and (5+2)n(5+2)^n and use binomial theorem :D

Nathan Ramesh - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

YAY! ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC! That's exactly what I was looking for @Patrick Corn @Mursalin Habib @Sreejato Bhattacharya! Please write more! I'm really happy that somebody's got it. :D

Finn Hulse - 7 years, 1 month ago

I don't see how the Binomial Theorem helps. Can you explain your solution?

Jon Haussmann - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Expand the first few cases

Nathan Ramesh - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Nathan Ramesh I'm afraid I still don't see it. How does expanding help?

Jon Haussmann - 7 years, 1 month ago

Look at it again. It is no coincidence that those two numbers have a mean of 55. :D

Finn Hulse - 7 years, 1 month ago

Lol i literally wrote a python program to try to figure this out I got n = 568, 1136, 2098, 2666, 2905, 4196, 4435, ...

Stefan Popescu - 3 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

That's awesome!

Finn Hulse - 3 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

thanks

Stefan Popescu - 3 years, 2 months ago

Check out my new problem!

Stefan Popescu - 3 years, 2 months ago

Nice question/ thing to prove. I'll attempt it. BTW, do you know the proof?

Sharky Kesa - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Yeah dude! This is part of a collection of proof problems I'm collecting from various olympiads. It's gonna be so boss once I've finished. :D

Finn Hulse - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Finn, im eagerly waiting for you cool approach! :)

Sagnik Saha - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Sagnik Saha I'll leave it to you guys for a while. :D

Finn Hulse - 7 years, 1 month ago

I believe that this is equivalent to finding an n n such that the fractional parts of nlog3 n \log 3 and nlog7 n \log 7 are both smaller than log1.1 \log 1.1 . (All logs are base 10.)

It seems like this should be no trouble, since log3 \log 3 and log7 \log 7 are both irrational...but I haven't yet written down anything rigorous. Just thought this would help.

Patrick Corn - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Yes, it easily follows from the fact that given any irrational number II and an arbitrarily small positive real r,r, there exist integers x,yx,y such that 1>x+Iy>1r.1>x+Iy>1-r.

Or alternatively, one-liner:

hello,

n=568n=568 works nicely.

Sonnhard

:P

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Voted up for the Sonnhard reference :)

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Mursalin Habib I did not get that. :P

Finn Hulse - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Finn Hulse Do you know Dr Sonnhard Graubner?

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Sreejato Bhattacharya Nope. The link says he doesn't exist. :/

Finn Hulse - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Finn Hulse You need to log in to your AoPS account. These two links will give you a fairly good idea of how he posts. ;)

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Sreejato Bhattacharya But I am logged in. Furthermore, only one of the links you gave works.

Sharky Kesa - 7 years, 1 month ago

I see what you're saying, but there's a really cool approach that doesn't use logarithms at all. :D

Finn Hulse - 7 years, 1 month ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...